Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38635030›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Health-related quality of life following salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy or focal therapy.

Severin Rodler, Dina Danninger, Lennert Eismann, Philipp Maximilian Kazmierczak, Friedrich Jokisch, Minglun Li, Armin Becker, Alexander Kretschmer, Christian Stief, Thilo Westhofen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Severin RodlerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. severin.rodler@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7600-6535
Dina DanningerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Lennert EismannDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Philipp Maximilian KazmierczakDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Friedrich JokischDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Minglun LiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.
Armin BeckerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Alexander KretschmerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christian StiefDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Thilo WesthofenDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEKlinikum Lüneburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSalvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is an important treatment option for patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after radiotherapy (RT) or focal therapy (FT). However, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after sRP depending on the primary treatment is understudied.

methodsPatients who underwent Salvage RP for recurrent PCa were analyzed. The primary outcome of this study was HRQOL assessed by the quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and its prostate specific QLQ-PR25 add-on. Secondary outcomes were functional outcome parameters (erectile function, continence) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). Statistical analyses employed the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kaplan-Meier method, with a p value < 0.05 denoting significance.

results37 patients with RT as primary treatment (RT-sRP) and 22 patients with focal therapy prior sRP (FT-sRP) were analyzed. Mean global health score was not significantly different preoperatively (71.9 vs. 67.3, p = 0.89) as well as after a median of 32 months follow-up (54.9 vs. 50.6, p = 0.63) with impaired HRQOL after sRP in both groups. Baseline erectile dysfunction was more prevalent in the RT-sRP group (mean IIEF-5: 5.0) than in the FT-sRP group (mean IIEF-5: 8.5, p = 0.037). No differences were observed at follow-up for erectile function (IIEF-5-Score: 0.5 vs 2.5, p = 0.199) and continence (continence rate: 48.4% vs 52.9% (p = 0.763) between the RT-sRP and FT-sRP group. 5-year-BRFS was 60% (RT-sRP) and 68% (FT-sRP, p = 0.849).

conclusionssRP impacts HRQOL in patients with PCa after RT and FT with no significant differences. Comparison with HRQOL and BRFS of treatment alternatives is paramount to counsel patients for appropriate treatments.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleProstateProstatectomyQuality of LifeLong-term outcomeQuality of lifeSalvage radical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID38635030
PMCPMC11026200
OpenAlexW4394920584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.