ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024
Accuracy of patient-specific CT organ doses from Monte Carlo simulations: influence of CT-based voxel models.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomy-resolved digital twin framework for personalized light dosimetry in lung therapies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- A practical method for measuring rotation angles in partial-angle CT scan by using CTDI phantoms, metal rods, and a real-time dosimeter.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Influence of Off-Centre Positioning, Scan Direction, and Localiser Projection Angle on Organ-Specific Radiation Doses in Low-Dose Chest CT: A Simulation Study Across Four Scanner Models.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Diagnostic CT organ dose estimation in whole-body PET/CT examinations-comparison of a patient-specific monte carlo approach and a computational phantom-based CT dosimetry tool.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monte Carlo simulations using patient CT images as input are the gold standard to perform patient-specific dosimetry. However, in standard clinical practice patient's CT images are limited to the reconstructed CT scan range. In this study, organ dose calculations were performed with ImpactMC for chest and cardiac CT using whole-body and anatomy-specific voxel models to estimate the accuracy of CT organ doses based on the latter model. When the 3D patient model is limited to the CT scan range, CT organ doses from Monte Carlo simulations are the most accurate for organs entirely in the field of view. For these organs only the radiation dose related to scatter from the rest of the body is not incorporated. For organs lying partially outside the field of view organ doses are overestimated by not accounting for the non-irradiated tissue mass. This overestimation depends strongly on the amount of the organ volume located outside the field of view. To get a more accurate estimation of the radiation dose to these organs, the ICRP reference organ masses and densities could form a solution. Except for the breast, good agreement in dose was found for most organs. Voxel models generated from clinical CT examinations do not include the overscan in the z-direction. The availability of whole-body voxel models allowed to study this influence as well. As expected, overscan induces slightly higher organ doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.