ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2024
Unexplained Residual Risk In Type 2 Diabetes: How Big Is The Problem?
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- suPAR Identifies Treatment-Resistant Inflammatory Risk Beyond hs-CRP in Type 2 Diabetes With Coronary Artery Disease: An Ancillary Analysis of BARI 2D.Diabetes care · 2026Trial
- Cardiometabolic index (CMI) and sarcopenia as predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in chronic kidney disease: a NHANES-based cohort study.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Adipose Tissue Immunosuppressive T Cells Regulate Atherosclerosis Development and Liver Fat Accumulation in Obesity.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Article
- Chronically elevated sympathetic nervous system tone: A significant, common, and poorly realised contributor to cardiometabolic disease in type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Rethinking the Diabetes-Cardiovascular Disease Continuum: Toward Integrated Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Impact of Remnant Cholesterol on Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2024Review
- Association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHHR), atherogenic index of plasma and acute ischemic stroke classified by CISS.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewWhat is new? Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes (T2D) individuals. Of the major risk factors for CVD, less than 10% of T2D people meet the American Diabetes Association/American Heart Association recommended goals of therapy. The present review examines how much of the absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk in type 2 diabetes patients can be explained by major CV intervention trials. RECENT
findingsMultiple long-term cardiovascular (CV) intervention trials have examined the effect of specific target-directed therapies on the MACE endpoint. Only one prospective study, STENO-2, has employed a multifactorial intervention comparing intensified versus conventional treatment of modifiable risk factors in T2D patients, and demonstrated a 20% absolute CV risk reduction. If the absolute CV risk reduction in these trials is added to that in the only prospective multifactorial intervention trial (STENO-2), the unexplained CV risk is 44.1%. What are the clinical implications? Potential explanations for the unaccounted-for reduction in absolute CV risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients are discussed. HYPOTHESIS: failure to take into account synergistic interactions between major cardiovascular risk factors is responsible for the unexplained CV risk in T2D patients. Simultaneous treatment of all major CV risk factors to recommended AHA/ADA guideline goals is required to achieve the maximum reduction in CV risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.