Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38634947›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2024

Deep learning automatically assesses 2-µm laser-induced skin damage OCT images.

Changke Wang, Qiong Ma, Yu Wei, Qi Liu, Yuqing Wang, Chenliang Xu, Caihui Li, Qingyu Cai, Haiyang Sun, Xiaoan Tang and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Changke WangBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Taiping Road, 100850, Beijing, China.
Qiong MaBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Taiping Road, 100850, Beijing, China.
Yu WeiBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Taiping Road, 100850, Beijing, China.
Qi LiuBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Taiping Road, 100850, Beijing, China.
Yuqing WangBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Taiping Road, 100850, Beijing, China.
Chenliang XuBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Taiping Road, 100850, Beijing, China.
Caihui LiBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Taiping Road, 100850, Beijing, China.
Qingyu CaiCollege of Information Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, 263 Kaiyuan Avenue, 471023, Luoyang, China.
Haiyang SunCollege of Information Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, 263 Kaiyuan Avenue, 471023, Luoyang, China.
Xiaoan TangCollege of Information Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, 263 Kaiyuan Avenue, 471023, Luoyang, China.
Hongxiang KangBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, 27 Taiping Road, 100850, Beijing, China. khx007@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8445-1981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study proposed a noninvasive, automated, in vivo assessment method based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and deep learning techniques to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the biological effects of 2-µm laser-induced skin damage at different irradiation doses. Different doses of 2-µm laser irradiation established a mouse skin damage model, after which the skin-damaged tissues were imaged non-invasively in vivo using OCT. The acquired images were preprocessed to construct the dataset required for deep learning. The deep learning models used were U-Net, DeepLabV3+, PSP-Net, and HR-Net, and the trained models were used to segment the damage images and further quantify the damage volume of mouse skin under different irradiation doses. The comparison of the qualitative and quantitative results of the four network models showed that HR-Net had the best performance, the highest agreement between the segmentation results and real values, and the smallest error in the quantitative assessment of the damage volume. Based on HR-Net to segment the damage image and quantify the damage volume, the irradiation doses 5.41, 9.55, 13.05, 20.85, 32.71, 52.92, 76.71, and 97.24 J/cm² corresponded to a damage volume of 4.58, 12.56, 16.74, 20.88, 24.52, 30.75, 34.13, and 37.32 mm³. The damage volume increased in a radiation dose-dependent manner.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalLasersMiceSkinTomography, Optical Coherence2-µm laserDeep learningImage segmentationLaser-induced skin damageOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.