ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Early neurological signs in infants identified through neonatal screening for SMA: do they predict outcome?
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten years of disease-modifying therapy in spinal muscular atrophy: lessons learned and future directions.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Application of the neonatal 'floppy module' to older infants: can it be used for differential diagnosis?European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Development of the "SMA NNE," a short neonatal neurological examination for newborns with spinal muscular atrophy.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Italian validation of the SMA independence scale-upper limb module.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- What did we learn from new treatments in SMA? A narrative review.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2025Review
- Prognostic factors for tube feeding in type I SMA patients treated with disease-modifying therapies: a cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal screening for SMA has allowed the identification of infants who may present with early clinical signs. Our aim was to establish whether the presence and the severity of early clinical signs have an effect on the development of motor milestones. Infants identified through newborn screening were prospectively assessed using a structured neonatal neurological examination and an additional module developed for the assessment of floppy infants. As part of the follow-up, all infants were assessed using the HINE-2 to establish developmental milestones. Only infants with at least 24 months of follow-up were included. Normal early neurological examination (n = 11) was associated with independent walking before the age of 18 months while infants with early clinical signs of SMA (n = 4) did not achieve ambulation (duration follow-up 33.2 months). Paucisymptomatic patients (n = 3) achieved ambulation, one before the age of 18 months and the other 2 between 22 and 24 months. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that early clinical signs may contribute to predict motor milestones development. What is Known: • There is increasing evidence of heterogeneity among the SMA newborns identified via NBS. • The proposed nosology describes a clinically silent disease, an intermediate category ('paucisymptomatic') and 'symptomatic SMA'. What is New: • The presence of minimal clinical signs at birth does not prevent the possibility to achieve independent walking but this may occur with some delay. • The combination of genotype at SMN locus and clinical evaluation may better predict the possibility to achieve milestones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.