Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38634885›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024

The ROSA knee robotic system demonstrates superior precision in restoring joint line height and posterior condylar offset compared to conventional manual TKA: a retrospective case-control study.

Zakareya Gamie, George Paparoidamis, Nikos Milonakis, Eustathios Kenanidis, Eleftherios Tsiridis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improved surgical accuracy in total knee arthroplasty using the ROSA® knee system: A randomised-controlled unblinded trial.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zakareya GamieTsiridis Orthopaedic Institute, ICAROS Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
George PaparoidamisAcademic Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikos MilonakisTsiridis Orthopaedic Institute, ICAROS Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eustathios KenanidisTsiridis Orthopaedic Institute, ICAROS Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece. ekenanidis@auth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9517-1600
Eleftherios TsiridisTsiridis Orthopaedic Institute, ICAROS Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8278-1653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVariations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) joint line height may lead to complications such as pain and altered joint mechanics, while posterior condylar offset (PCO) can influence knee stability.

methodsSingle-centre, single-surgeon retrospective analysis from December 2019 to May 2023 investigated primary unilateral TKA (Nexgen Legacy, Zimmer Biomet) in patients with knee osteoarthritis, using ROSA robotic system (raTKA) or conventional manual technique (mTKA). Joint line height and PCO were measured and compared in 182 raTKA and 144 mTKA patients.

resultsThe groups were matched in age (p = 0.847) and sex distribution (p = 0.2). Excellent interobserver agreement (ICC ≥ 0.9). RaTKA mean joint line height difference was - 0.0001 mm (± 3.48, 95% CI - 0.509, 0.509) (p = 0.523), - 0.951 mm for mTKA (± 4.33, 95% CI - 1.664, - 0.237) (p = 0.009). RaTKA mean PCO difference was 0.52 mm (± 2.45, 95% CI 0.160, 0.880) (p = 0.005), 1.15 mm for mTKA (± 4.01, 95% CI - 1.496, 1.818) (p < 0.001). Mean difference in joint line height of 0.95 mm between groups was significant (p = 0.027), and for PCO, it was 0.63 mm, demonstrating tendency towards significance (p = 0.08). Mean absolute value in joint line height difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.235) but highly significant for PCO (p < 0.001).

conclusionThe ROSA knee robotic system can more accurately restore joint line height and PCO compared to conventional manual TKA. The improved degree of precision raTKA offers may be a vehicle for better Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, but further correlational studies are required.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArthroplastyJointKneeOsteoarthritisRestorationRoboticsTechnology

Identifiers

PMID38634885
PMCPMC11291514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.