ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Current diagnostics and treatment of ankle sprains in German].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Injuries to the lateral ankle ligaments].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnkle sprains are one of the most frequent injuries of the musculoskeletal system. The injury pattern determines the treatment and are crucial for the outcome. Nonoperative treatment is commonly recommended for isolated injuries of the lateral ligaments but no standard strategy exists in combined ankle ligament injuries. The goal of this national survey was to achieve an overview about the current diagnostic strategies and common treatment concepts in Germany. MATERIAL AND
methodsAll members of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) were invited to participate in an anonymous survey about the diagnostic and therapeutic approach in cases of ankle sprains. The online survey consisted of 20 questions. Besides questions about the speciality and scope of activities the participants were ask to depict their diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.
resultsA total of 806 participants completed the survey. Most of them were orthopedic trauma surgeons and worked in a hospital. During the first presentation the anterior drawer test (89.5%) and the inversion/eversion test (81.6%) were most commonly used, 88.1% always make an X‑ray examination and 26.5% an ultrasonography examination. Isolated injuries of the anterior fibulotalar ligament (LFTA) were treated nonoperatively by 99.7% of the participants, 78.8% recommend full weight bearing in an orthesis, 78.8% treat the complete rupture of the lateral ligaments without operation whereas 30.1% stated that they would treat a combined lateral ligaments rupture with an injury of the syndesmosis nonoperatively. DISCUSSION: Due to the heterogeneity of injury patterns after ankle sprain no consistent recommendations for diagnostics and treatment exist. The Ottawa ankle rules and ultrasonography were not often utilized despite of the good evidence. The isolated rupture of the LFTA is diagnosed and treated according to the national guidelines by most of the participants. In cases of combined injuries of the lateral and medial ankle ligaments the majority choose a nonoperative treatment strategy which is justified by the guidelines with a low level of evidence. Combined injuries of the syndesmosis and the lateral ankle ligaments were treated operatively, which also correlates with the recommendations in the literature. The standard care of ankle sprain in Germany is in accordance with the recommendations from the current literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.