Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38634461›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2024

Using Virtual Reality in a Rehabilitation Program for Patients With Breast Cancer: Phenomenological Study.

Shih-Chung Wu, Chia-Wen Chuang, Wen-Chun Liao, Chung-Fang Li, Hsin-Hsin Shih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Experiences and perceptions of cancer patients receiving virtual reality therapy: a meta‑synthesis of qualitative research.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shih-Chung WuDepartment of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-6089
Chia-Wen ChuangDepartment of Nursing, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3671-1675
Wen-Chun LiaoSchool of Nursing, College of Healthcare, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-926X
Chung-Fang LiDepartment of Nursing, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4593-3704
Hsin-Hsin ShihSchool of Nursing, College of Healthcare, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8317-7164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgery is an essential treatment for early-stage breast cancer. However, various side effects of breast cancer surgery, such as arm dysfunction and lymphedema, remain causes for concern. Rehabilitation exercises to prevent such side effects should be initiated within 24 hours after surgery. Virtual reality (VR) can assist the process of rehabilitation; however, the feasibility of applying VR for rehabilitation must be explored, in addition to experiences of this application. Objective: This study explored patients' attitudes toward and experiences of using VR for their rehabilitation to determine the feasibility of such VR use and to identify potential barriers. Methods: A phenomenological qualitative study was conducted from September to December 2021. A total of 18 patients with breast cancer who had undergone surgical treatment were interviewed using open-ended questions. The Colaizzi 7-step procedure for phenomenological analysis was used for data analysis. To ensure high study reliability, this study followed previously reported quality criteria for trustworthiness. Results: Three themes were identified: (1) VR was powerful in facilitating rehabilitation, (2) early and repetitive upper limb movements were an advantage of VR rehabilitation, and (3) extensive VR use had challenges to be overcome. Most of the interviewed patients reported positive experiences of using VR for rehabilitation. Specifically, VR helped these patients identify appropriate motion and angle limits while exercising; in other words, knowledge gained through VR can play a key role in the rehabilitation process. In addition, the patients reported that the use of VR provided them company, similar to when a physiotherapist is present. Finally, the gamified nature of the VR system seemed to make VR-based rehabilitation more engaging than traditional rehabilitation, particularly with respect to early rehabilitation; however, the high cost of VR equipment made VR-based rehabilitation difficult to implement at home. Conclusions: The interviewed patients with breast cancer had positive experiences in using VR for rehabilitation. The high cost of both VR equipment and software development presents a challenge for applying VR-based rehabilitation.

Indexed as

accessibilitybreast cancerfeasibilityrehabilitationvirtual realityvirtual reality design processVRVR design process

Identifiers

PMID38634461
PMCPMC11067444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.