Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38634204›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2024

Population pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal irinotecan and SN-38 in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal origin.

Pascale C S Rietveld, Sebastiaan D T Sassen, Niels A D Guchelaar, Ruben A G van Eerden, Nadine L de Boer, Teun B M van den Heuvel, Jacobus W A Burger, Ron H J Mathijssen, Birgit C P Koch, Stijn L W Koolen

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pascale C S RietveldDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-6039-8458
Sebastiaan D T SassenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-638X
Niels A D GuchelaarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8080-9093
Ruben A G van EerdenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nadine L de BoerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Teun B M van den HeuvelDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jacobus W A BurgerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5667-5697
Birgit C P KochDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with PM have a poor prognosis, and for those who are not eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), palliative chemotherapy is currently the only option. Recently, we conducted a phase I trial (INTERACT) in which irinotecan was administered intraperitoneally (IP) to 18 patients ineligible for CRS-HIPEC. The primary objective was to evaluate covariates influencing the PK profile of irinotecan and SN-38 after IP administration. Secondly, a population PK model was developed to support the further development of IP irinotecan by improving dosing in patients with PM. Patients were treated with IP irinotecan every 2 weeks in combination with systemic FOLFOX-bevacizumab. Irinotecan and SN-38 were measured in plasma (588 samples) and SN-38 was measured in peritoneal fluid (267 samples). Concentration-Time data were log-transformed and analyzed using NONMEM version 7.5 using FOCE+I estimation. An additive error model described the residual error, with inter-individual variability in PK parameters modeled exponentially. The final structural model consisted of five compartments. Weight was identified as a covariate influencing the SN-38 plasma volume of distribution and GGT was found to influence the SN-38 plasma clearance. This population PK model adequately described the irinotecan and SN-38 in plasma after IP administration, with weight and GGT as predictive factors. Irinotecan is converted intraperitoneal to SN-38 by carboxylesterases and the plasma bioavailability of irinotecan is low. This model will be used for the further clinical development of IP irinotecan by providing dosing strategies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColorectal NeoplasmsIrinotecanPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedBevacizumabCamptothecinFemaleFluorouracilHumansInjections, IntraperitonealLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalBevacizumabCamptothecinFluorouracilIrinotecanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID38634204
PMCPMC11179701
OpenAlexW4394921247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.