SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024
Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analyses.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, novel therapies targeting specific molecular pathways and immunotherapies have exhibited promising outcomes for treating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Our work aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of these emerging treatment regimens for this disease. Material and methods: We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials their inception to August 2023 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The quality of eligible RCTs was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, version 2 (RoB2). Investigated outcomes encompassed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), pathologic complete remission (pCR), and adverse events (AEs). They were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% conference intervals (CI) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Results: Our analysis identified a total of 28 RCTs suitable for inclusion in the NMA. Regarding the PFS, all these treatment regimens exhibited comparable effectiveness. In terms of OS, Capecitabine+Trastuzumab, Lapatinib+Trastuzumab and Pyrotinib+Capecitabine exhibited better effect compared to other treatments. Regarding pCR and AEs, all these treatment regimens exhibited comparable effectiveness, especially Lapatinib+Trastuzumab and Pyrotinib+Capecitabine. Conclusion: Our study highlights the prominent role of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in treating HER2-positive breast cancer. The efficacy of trastuzumab-containing regimens was superior to other treatment options, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Based on these findings, trastuzumab-containing regimens emerge as a preferable and recommended choice in clinical practice for managing HER2-positive breast cancer. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023414348.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.