ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Influence of access cavity design on root canal instrumentation efficacy in molars - An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of endodontic access cavity design on root canal localization in mandibular first premolars using microscope and ultrasonic tips.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Access cavity in endodontics: Balancing precision, preservation, and clinical needs.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Prevalence ofJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Access Cavities: A Benefit/Risk Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative Retreatment Efficacy of Two Multi-File Systems with Different Access Cavity Designs: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Postoperative pain evaluation in patients undergoing endodontic treatment subsequent to working length determination with and without integrated apex locator endomotor: Randomized control trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several designs of access cavity have been evolved in the recent past with the concept of minimal tooth tissue removal which would improve the root canal treated teeth fracture resistance. Aim: To investigate the effect of conservative design access cavity during the instrumentation of maxillary molar root canals. Materials and Methods: Eighty noncarious maxillary molars were assigned to the traditional and conservative access groups ( Results: The volume of pulp canal space before and after instrumentation changed significantly between the traditional and conservative access design groups, according to an independent Conclusion: The volume of dentin removed was greater in TAC than with the CAC design. The amount of untouched canal wall area was significantly higher in conservative access design than with the traditional access design group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.