ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Evaluation of minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration of royal jelly against
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid Sonochemical-Pressure Fabrication of tri-element nanohybrids for advanced biological protection in resin and metal dental crowns.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Potential and Sustainable Bioprocessing of Enterocin CC2: A Probiotic-Derived Antimicrobial Targeting Streptococcus mutans in Oral Health.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial and biofilm inhibition effects of royal jelly, chlorhexidine, and calcium hydroxide - AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Assessing the antibacterial potency of royal jelly: Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration evaluation againstJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- A Comparison of Conventional Root Canal Sealers With Ones That Use Green Synthesized Nanoparticles for Antimicrobial Activity: Protocol for a Systematic Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Enriched advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus gold nanoparticles againstJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Biocompatibility and odontogenic potential of an indigenous apitherapeutic pulp capping agent: A comparative in vitro analysis using hDPSCs.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to ascertain the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of royal jelly (RJ) against three microorganisms frequently linked with endodontic infections: Materials and Methods: Freshly harvested RJ was prepared at different concentrations (20%, 10%, 5%, 2.5%, and 1.25%) in distilled water. The microbial cultures of the target organisms were prepared. MIC was determined using a broth dilution technique, monitoring microbial growth. MBC was determined by inoculating agar plates with samples from tubes showing no apparent growth and evaluating the presence of bacterial or fungal growth following the incubation period. Results: For Conclusion: The antimicrobial properties of RJ against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.