ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2024
Brain tumor segmentation using neuro-technology enabled intelligence-cascaded U-Net model.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of U-Net Based Deep Learning Frameworks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Brain Tumor Segmentation Using U-Net With ResNet50 Encoder for Enhanced MRI Analysis.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Enhancing brain tumor detection in MRI with a rotation invariant Vision Transformer.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to experts in neurology, brain tumours pose a serious risk to human health. The clinical identification and treatment of brain tumours rely heavily on accurate segmentation. The varied sizes, forms, and locations of brain tumours make accurate automated segmentation a formidable obstacle in the field of neuroscience. U-Net, with its computational intelligence and concise design, has lately been the go-to model for fixing medical picture segmentation issues. Problems with restricted local receptive fields, lost spatial information, and inadequate contextual information are still plaguing artificial intelligence. A convolutional neural network (CNN) and a Mel-spectrogram are the basis of this cough recognition technique. First, we combine the voice in a variety of intricate settings and improve the audio data. After that, we preprocess the data to make sure its length is consistent and create a Mel-spectrogram out of it. A novel model for brain tumor segmentation (BTS), Intelligence Cascade U-Net (ICU-Net), is proposed to address these issues. It is built on dynamic convolution and uses a non-local attention mechanism. In order to reconstruct more detailed spatial information on brain tumours, the principal design is a two-stage cascade of 3DU-Net. The paper's objective is to identify the best learnable parameters that will maximize the likelihood of the data. After the network's ability to gather long-distance dependencies for AI, Expectation-Maximization is applied to the cascade network's lateral connections, enabling it to leverage contextual data more effectively. Lastly, to enhance the network's ability to capture local characteristics, dynamic convolutions with local adaptive capabilities are used in place of the cascade network's standard convolutions. We compared our results to those of other typical methods and ran extensive testing utilising the publicly available BraTS 2019/2020 datasets. The suggested method performs well on tasks involving BTS, according to the experimental data. The Dice scores for tumor core (TC), complete tumor, and enhanced tumor segmentation BraTS 2019/2020 validation sets are 0.897/0.903, 0.826/0.828, and 0.781/0.786, respectively, indicating high performance in BTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.