Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38633988›Full record

ArticleJournal of aging research2024

A Two-Phased Pilot Study Evaluating the Feasibility and Acceptability of the Cognitively Enriched Walking Program "Take a Walk with Your Brain" for Older Adults.

Pauline Hotterbeex, Melanie Beeckman, Pieter-Jan Marent, Julie Latomme, Fien De Block, Lauren De Baets, Sebastien Chastin, Greet Cardon, Jannique G Z van Uffelen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aging research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pauline HotterbeexDepartment of Movement Sciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-2986
Melanie BeeckmanArtevelde University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-3581
Pieter-Jan MarentDepartment of Movement Sciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9308-931X
Julie LatommeDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University Research for Aging Young, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-6423
Fien De BlockDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University Research for Aging Young, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0422-7897
Lauren De BaetsDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University Research for Aging Young, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sebastien ChastinDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University Research for Aging Young, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1421-9348
Greet CardonDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University Research for Aging Young, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4983-6557
Jannique G Z van UffelenDepartment of Movement Sciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-5766
Ghent University · BEArtevelde University College Ghent · BEGlasgow Caledonian University · GBKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the aging population, finding solutions to retain optimal cognitive capacity is a research priority. The potential of physical activity to reduce the risk of cognitive decline and to enhance cognitive functioning is established. Combining physical with cognitive activity has been put forward as a potentially even more effective way to promote healthy cognitive aging. Most studies on combined interventions have however been conducted in laboratory settings. This paper reports on a two-phased pilot study evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of a newly developed real-life cognitively enriched walking program for adults aged 65+ years. In Phase I, the feasibility and enjoyability of the cognitive tasks was evaluated by conducting walk-along interviews with older adults (

Identifiers

PMID38633988
PMCPMC11023734
OpenAlexW4394675274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.