ReviewCureus2024
The Management of Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia-Related Hypotension in the United States During Cesarean Childbirth.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06836986 (COMPARISON BETWEEN EFFICACY OF NOREPINEPHRINE AND PHENYLEPHRINE BOLUSES FOR PREVENTION OF SPINAL ANAESTHESIA INDUCED HYPOTENSION IN OBSTETRICAL PATIENTS UNDERGOING EMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTION- A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
COMPARISON BETWEEN EFFICACY OF NOREPINEPHRINE AND PHENYLEPHRINE BOLUSES FOR PREVENTION OF SPINAL ANAESTHESIA INDUCED HYPOTENSION IN OBSTETRICAL PATIENTS UNDERGOING EMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTION- A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence, factors associated, and adverse maternal outcomes of spinal induced hypotension among mothers undergoing caesarean section at a tertiary hospital South-Western Uganda.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for hypotension after neuraxial anesthesia in preeclamptic parturients: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study delves into the prevalence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean (c-section) childbirth, focusing on existing treatments and their efficacy. Currently, neuraxial analgesia is the most efficient method for alleviating pain during c-sections, but its major side effect, hypotension, necessitates a thorough understanding of the available treatment options. A scoping review was conducted using PubMed and Rayyan, with inclusion criteria being English peer-reviewed articles from the last five years, involving nulligravida/primigravida women under 35 years old in the United States. The research reveals various treatments to mitigate spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. Norepinephrine and epinephrine have demonstrated effectiveness in maintaining blood pressure while reducing adverse maternal outcomes following delivery. When comparing fixed-rate infusions of norepinephrine to phenylephrine, norepinephrine demonstrated lower rates of bradycardia (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.