ArticleInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology2023
How Successful Are APRI and FIB-4 Scores in Predicting Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients?
Article in Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of the Fuzheng Huayu formula in the treatment of hepatitis B-associated liver fibrosis or cirrhosis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024Pooled it
- Performance of Serum-Based Non-Invasive Fibrosis Scores Compared with Liver Biopsy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Association between steatotic liver disease (MASLD, met-ALD, and ALD) with preserved ratio impaired spirometry: a population-based study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing hepatosteatosis in endogenous Cushing's syndrome: the hepatic steatosis index as a reliable diagnostic tool.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- LIMITED DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF FIB-4 FOR DETECTING SIGNIFICANT LIVER FIBROSIS IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS B: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Article
- Redefining the albumin-bilirubin score: Predictive modeling and multidimensional integration in liver and systemic disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Investigation of Hepatitis C, D, and HIV Seroprevalence and Evaluation of APRI and FIB-4 Scores in HbsAg-Positive Patients.Viruses · 2025Article
- Anti-hepatitis B Virus Treatment with Tenofovir Amibufenamide Has No Impact on Blood Lipids: A Real-world, Prospective, 48-week Follow-up Study.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2024Article
- Associated Factors for Liver Fibrosis and Histological Activity Index in Treatment-Naïve HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Infection: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic indicators and lifestyle interventions of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the correlation of fibrosis severity in liver biopsies, the gold standard for the diagnosis of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), using noninvasive methods such as the aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4). Materials and Methods: The study included patients who were followed and treated for CHB in 2018-2023. Biochemical markers and liver biopsy findings of the cases were retrospectively, and their correlations with APRI and FIB-4, which are noninvasive scores, were compared. Results: The study included 202 patients. The biochemical markers and liver biopsy findings of the cases were examined retrospectively, and their correlations with the noninvasive scores APRI and FIB-4 were compared. According to liver biopsy results, 109 (54.0%) cases had no fibrosis (stage 0.1), 85 (42.1%) cases had mild fibrosis (stage 2, 3), and 8 (4%) cases had severe fibrosis (stage 4, 5, 6). The median FIB-4 score was 0.79 (0.25 -11.74), and the median APRI score was 0.29 (0.10-29.40). When the predictive power of the APRI score to discriminate between "without fibrosis" and "with fibrosis (mild and severe)" was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, for the APRI score >0.408 as the ideal cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 34% and 79%, respectively. When the cut-off point for the FIB-4 score was >0.701, the sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 46%, respectively. Although the area under the curve (AUC) ratios ranged between 52% and 64% in the ROC analyses, the sensitivity ratios of the cut-off points calculated for FIB-4 were higher. The likelihood ratios of the cut-off point we found for the APRI score (1.61 and 1.75, respectively) were relatively better than those for FIB-4 (1.31 and 1.41, respectively). Conclusion: Noninvasive tests used to detect liver fibrosis in individuals with CHB do not eliminate the need for liver biopsy but may provide insight into the fibrosis status of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.