Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38633840›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2024

Switching from immediate- to extended-release cysteamine in patients with nephropathic cystinosis: from clinical trials to clinical practice.

Gema Ariceta, Fernando Santos, Andrés López Muñiz, Alvaro Hermida, Maria Luisa Matoses, Ana Ventura, Paloma Leticia Martin-Moreno, Esther González, Laura Acuña, Elisa Giner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drug-Related Halitosis: A Narrative Review.International dental journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Gema AricetaPaediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Autonomous University of Barcelona,  Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1763-1098
Fernando SantosPaediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Andrés López MuñizNephrology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de la Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Alvaro HermidaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Maria Luisa MatosesPaediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Ana VenturaNephrology Department, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Paloma Leticia Martin-MorenoNephrology Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain.
Esther GonzálezNephrology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Laura AcuñaMedical Department, Chiesi España S.A.U., Barcelona, Spain.
Elisa GinerMedical Department, Chiesi España S.A.U., Barcelona, Spain.
Julia VaraPaediatric Nephrology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of switching from immediate-release (IR) to extended-release (ER) cysteamine in patients with nephropathic cystinosis (NC) in Spain. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentre study in NC patients who received IR cysteamine for at least 12 months, switched to ER cysteamine, and received it for at least 6 months before inclusion. Results: Data were collected from nine patients (four children, five adults) 36 months before and after the switch. Despite the highly selected population, an improvement in growth, particularly in children and a significant reduction in hospitalization days was observed. A decrease in halitosis, body odour and gastrointestinal effects was reported in most of the patients who suffered before the switch, and the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) decreased in some patients. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained stable in patients with preserved kidney function. No significant changes in white blood cell (WBC) cystine levels were observed after the switch. There was no significant difference in the cysteamine dose received. However, some patients were receiving <50% of the recommended dose of cysteamine before and after the switch and showed elevated levels of WBC cystine. Conclusions: Switching from IR to ER cysteamine in clinical practice reduces hospital stays, improves nutritional status and growth in paediatric patients and could help to enhance treatment tolerability by reducing side effects. Furthermore, the dosing of ER cysteamine could promote therapeutic compliance and positively affect the quality of life of the NC population.

Indexed as

effectivenessextended-release cysteamineimmediate-release cysteaminenephropathic cystinosisswitching

Identifiers

PMID38633840
PMCPMC11022652
OpenAlexW4392564541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.