ArticleBJUI compass2024
Newly modified 'pseudo flap' without compromising vascularity to enhance repair of long distal ureteral loss: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database.
Article in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To present an alternative technique called pseudo-flap for reconstructing long ureteral defects as an alternative to Boari flap. Despite being used for more than 70 years by urologists for tension-free reconstruction of distal and mid-ureteral defects, the Boari flap exhibits high complication rates, with an average of 27% (range 5.5%-30.4%). These complications arise from compromised blood supply, attributed to incisions made on all three sides of the flap and dependence on the flap base as the sole source of blood supply. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent our modified technique by a single surgeon between 2008 and 2021. We used a semi-oblique cystotomy on the lowest part of the anterior and contralateral aspects of the bladder after complete release from adhesions and sacrificing the superior vesical pedicle, if necessary. The innovative part of the technique involved making short relaxing incisions at different levels on both sides of a pseudo-flap while pushing the bladder dome upward to reach the healthy ureter in a tension-free manner, followed by anastomosis with a non-refluxing or refluxing technique. Results: Fifteen patients underwent the pseudo-flap technique with a mean follow-up of 16.9 months. Four had prior radiation, three had hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis, and one had a ureteral stricture in a transplanted kidney. Eight procedures were performed during intraoperative consultations.Only one patient (7%) developed a major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2). This patient developed postoperative leak, and none developed obstructive hydronephrosis, suggesting stricture or flap ischemia. The mean length of the flap was 9.3 cm. Conclusion: Our pseudo-flap technique has lower complication rates than the traditional Boari flap. It is not technically challenging, minimally compromises blood supply and is thus especially suitable for complex, highly morbid patients with decreased tissue vascularity, such as those with prior radiation and peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.