Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38633660›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2024

Automatic grading of intervertebral disc degeneration in lumbar dog spines.

Frank Niemeyer, Fabio Galbusera, Martijn Beukers, René Jonas, Youping Tao, Marion Fusellier, Marianna A Tryfonidou, Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke, Annette Kienle, Hans-Joachim Wilke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Frank NiemeyerInstitute for Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Centre for Trauma Research University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.
Fabio GalbuseraInstitute for Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Centre for Trauma Research University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.
Martijn BeukersDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
René JonasInstitute for Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Centre for Trauma Research University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.
Youping TaoSpineServ GmbH & Co. KG Ulm Germany.
Marion FusellierMaitre de Conférences Imagerie Médicale, INSERM UMRS1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton RMeS Team STEP School of Dental Surgery Nantes France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5336-9352
Marianna A TryfonidouDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2333-7162
Cornelia Neidlinger-WilkeInstitute for Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Centre for Trauma Research University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.
Annette KienleSpineServ GmbH & Co. KG Ulm Germany.
Hans-Joachim WilkeInstitute for Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Centre for Trauma Research University Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6007-8844
University Hospital Ulm · DEUtrecht University · NLInserm · FRSchulthess-Klinik · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intervertebral disc degeneration is frequent in dogs and can be associated with symptoms and functional impairments. The degree of disc degeneration can be assessed on T2-weighted MRI scans using the Pfirrmann classification scheme, which was developed for the human spine. However, it could also be used to quantify the effectiveness of disc regeneration therapies. We developed and tested a deep learning tool able to automatically score the degree of disc degeneration in dog spines, starting from an existing model designed to process images of human patients. Methods: MRI midsagittal scans of 5991 lumbar discs of dog patients were collected and manually evaluated with the Pfirrmann scheme and a modified scheme with transitional grades. A deep learning model was trained to classify the disc images based on the two schemes and tested by comparing its performance with the model processing human images. Results: The determination of the Pfirrmann grade showed sensitivities higher than 83% for all degeneration grades, except for grade 5, which is rare in dog spines, and high specificities. In comparison, the correspondent human model had slightly higher sensitivities, on average 90% versus 85% for the canine model. The modified scheme with the fractional grades did not show significant advantages with respect to the original Pfirrmann grades. Conclusions: The novel tool was able to accurately and reliably score the severity of disc degeneration in dogs, although with a performance inferior than that of the human model. The tool has potential in the clinical management of disc degeneration in canine patients as well as in longitudinal studies evaluating regenerative therapies in dogs used as animal models of human disorders.

Indexed as

canine spinedeep learningdegenerationimage analysismachine learningradiological classification

Identifiers

PMID38633660
PMCPMC11022603
OpenAlexW4394869221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.