ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
CDK4/6 inhibitors in drug-induced liver injury: a pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS database and analysis of the drug-gene interaction network.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Integrated care for long-responder women with metastatic breast cancer: Expert opinion for long term management in spain].Atencion primaria · 2026Guideline
- Multidisciplinary Practical Guidance for Implementing Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Patients with HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Guideline
- Expert consensus on optimal management of liver-related adverse events during CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Risk factors of hepatotoxicity with ribociclib in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Article
- Cell-cycle targeted cancer therapy: clinical advances, biological gaps, and the emergence of selective CDK4 inhibitors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Integrative multi-omics analysis reveals gut-skin axis mechanisms and novel therapeutic targetmSystems · 2026Article
- Mitigating Severe Ribociclib-Hepatotoxicity With Corticosteroids.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing the risk of adverse drug events from combining aromatase inhibitors with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS and JADER databases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- SSRIs-induced liver injury adverse events: a data-based retrospective study and investigation of potential toxicological mechanisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Acute Hepatitis in a Patient Treated With Ribociclib for Metastatic Breast Carcinoma.Journal of medical cases · 2025Article
- Safety assessment of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and comparison of time to adverse events.PloS one · 2025Article
- Unveiling esophageal cancer treatment mechanisms: network pharmacology and molecular docking of Physcion.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Management of Severe Abemaciclib-induced Liver Dysfunction: Feasibility of Switching to Palbociclib.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib by comprehensively analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Moreover, potential toxicological mechanisms of CDK4/6is-related liver injury were explored via drug-gene network analysis. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we collected reports of DILI associated with CDK4/6i use from the FAERS dated January 2014 to March 2023. We conducted disproportionality analyses using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Pathway enrichment analysis and drug-gene network analyses were subsequently performed to determine the potential mechanisms underlying CDK4/6i-induced liver injury. Results: We found positive signals for DILI with ribociclib (ROR = 2.60) and abemaciclib (ROR = 2.37). DILIs associated with liver-related investigations, signs, and symptoms were confirmed in all three reports of CDK4/6is. Moreover, ascites was identified as an unlisted hepatic adverse effect of palbociclib. We isolated 189 interactive target genes linking CDK4/6 inhibitors to hepatic injury. Several key genes, such as STAT3, HSP90AA1, and EP300, were revealed via protein-protein analysis, emphasizing their central roles within the network. KEGG pathway enrichment of these genes highlighted multiple pathways. Conclusion: Our study revealed variations in hepatobiliary toxicity among the different CDK4/6 inhibitors, with ribociclib showing the highest risk of liver injury, followed by abemaciclib, while palbociclib appeared relatively safe. Our findings emphasize the need for cautious use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and regular liver function monitoring is recommended for long-term CDK4/6 inhibitor use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.