ArticleInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology2022
Evaluation of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Treatment in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.
Article in Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The main purpose of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment is to improve the patients' life quality and prevent the disease from progressing to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Continuous suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA with nucleoside or nucleotide analogues is the most critical way to achieve this goal. This study aimed to evaluate the CHB patients retrospectively followed up with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment. Materials and Methods: The study was planned as retrospective research by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology between January 2001 and December 2020. We evaluated all treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients who received TDF (245 mg/day) treatment with the diagnosis of CHB. The data were obtained by reviewing the file information registered in the hospital automation system. HBsAg, Anti-HBs, HBeAg, Anti-HBe, HBV DNA, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values of the patients were evaluated at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months, and 6-month follow-ups throughout the treatment. Virological (HBV-DNA of < 50 IU/ml), biochemical (decrease below 40 IU/Ml in patients with pre-treatment value of ALT >40 IU/ml) and serological (Anti-HBe seroconversion in HBeAg positives and HBsAg negative and anti-HBs seroconversion in all patients) responses were examined. Adverse effects were also assessed during the treatment. Results: Data from 131 patients who received TDF treatment were evaluated. Virological responses were determined as 78.6%, 81.3%, 94.2%, and 100% in the patients at 24th week, 48th week, 4th year, and 8th year, respectively. While there was no Anti-HBs seroconversion in any patients in four years of the treatment, it was observed at a rate of 10.5% in the eighth year. We did not determine any significant adverse effects requiring discontinuation of the treatment in the long-term follow-up of 131 patients under TDF treatment. Conclusion: As a result of our study, TDF was an effective and well-tolerated choice for CHB treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.