ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Dysexecutive difficulty and subtle everyday functional disabilities: the digital Trail Making Test.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Validity Study of a Mobile Corsi Block Test for Visuospatial Working Memory in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Psychometric modeling of Boston process approach data for dementia prediction in the Framingham Heart Study.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2026Article
- Digital neuropsychological assessment-Part 2: Relations with cardiovascular risk and informant ratings of neurocognitive decline, functional disabilities, and psychiatric symptoms.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Semi-Supervised Clustering for Identification of MCI and Dementia Cohorts with a Brief Digital Cognitive Assessment.Research square · 2026Article
- Precision neurocognition: An emerging diagnostic paradigm leveraging digital cognitive assessment technology.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Review
- Performance of the digital trail making test in older adults with white matter lesions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Digital neuropsychological tests reliably capture real-time, process-based behavior that traditional paper/pencil tests cannot detect, enabling earlier detection of neurodegenerative illness. We assessed relations between informant-based subtle and mild functional decline and process-based features extracted from the digital Trail Making Test-Part B (dTMT-B). Methods: A total of 321 community-dwelling participants (56.0% female) were assessed with the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) and the dTMT-B. Three FAQ groups were constructed: FAQ = 0 (unimpaired); FAQ = 1-4 (subtle impairment); FAQ = 5-8 (mild impairment). Results: Compared to the FAQ-unimpaired group, other groups required longer pauses inside target circles ( Conclusion: Digital assessment technology elegantly quantifies occult, nuanced behavior not previously appreciated, operationally defines critical underlying neurocognitive constructs related to functional abilities, and yields selected process-based scores that outperform traditional paper/pencil test scores for participant classification. When brought to scale, the dTMT-B test could be a sensitive tool to detect subtle-to-mild functional deficits in emergent neurodegenerative illnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.