ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Proning the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation plus Impella: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prone Positioning During ECPELLA Support for Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Management of non-Cardiac Organ Failure in cardiogenic shock.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prone position is recommended as supportive therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, little is known about prone position ventilation in patients with cardiogenic shock supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) plus Impella (ECPELLA) developing ARDS. Case summary: A 66-year-old man with severe left ventricular dysfunction was admitted to a non-academic ECMO centre for a high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting. He developed post-cardiotomy shock needing ECMO support. To improve left ventricular unloading, an Impella was inserted 2 days later. One day later, he developed ARDS and needed prone position ventilation with ECPELLA Discussion: Previous studies demonstrated that prone positioning could help avoid an additional venous cannula in veno-arterial ECMO patients, which is associated with mechanical complications. In this case, there was a promising role for unloading the left ventricle with Impella during veno-arterial ECMO and, for proning, the patient with cardiogenic shock developing ARDS during ECMO support without the need for an extra venous cannula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.