Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38633389›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases & clinical microbiology2022

The Effect of the Pandemic on Antifungal Use: What Has Changed?

Vildan Avkan-Oğuz, Çaglar Irmak, Kağan Dağdeviren, Oya Eren-Kutsoylu, Arzu Nazlı, Muammer Çelik, Serdar Bayrak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vildan Avkan-OğuzDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-7730
Çaglar IrmakDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-3757
Kağan DağdevirenDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3814-9401
Oya Eren-KutsoyluDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3814-0474
Arzu NazlıDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-6432
Muammer ÇelikDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6190-5370
Serdar BayrakDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-9023
Dokuz Eylül University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, antimicrobial and antifungal stewardship programs have lost their priority. Although all parenteral antifungals were used with the recommendations of infectious diseases specialists in the pre-pandemic period, most consultations were delayed during the pandemic because of the workload of infectious diseases specialists. In this period, antifungal treatments in hospitalized patients were managed by mostly primary physicians. Therefore, we aimed to detect the change in the consumption of antifungals during the pandemic. Materials and Methods: The data on the antifungal drug use by month and clinics, the number of beds, and the occupancy rate of the clinics were obtained from the hospital information registration system. We defined each drug according to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (WHO ATC) coding system and determined the defined daily dose (DDD). The antifungal consumption (DDD/ 100 bed-days) in pre-pandemic and pandemic periods was compared. Results: During the pandemic, the antifungal consumption increased two-fold (2019:7.43; 2020:18.03 DDD/100 bed-days). The highest antifungal consumption rate was in the hematology- oncology-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) clinics with 2.5-fold (2019:39.86; 2020:98.48 DDD/ 100 bed-days) increase. Liposomal amphotericin B consumption made up the majority of this with a four-fold increase in the hematology-oncology-HSCT clinics. Conclusion: We detected a dramatic increase in antifungal consumption in both ICUs and inpatient clinics during pandemic. A novel antifungal stewardship approach is urgently needed.

Indexed as

amphotericin Bantifungal consumptionantifungal stewardshipazoleCOVID-19echinocandinpandemic

Identifiers

PMID38633389
PMCPMC10985811
OpenAlexW4297243354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.