Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38633305›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

The development and validation of automated machine learning models for predicting lymph node metastasis in Siewert type II T1 adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Chenghao Lu, Lu Liu, Minyue Yin, Jiaxi Lin, Shiqi Zhu, Jingwen Gao, Shuting Qu, Guoting Xu, Lihe Liu, Jinzhou Zhu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chenghao LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Lu LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Minyue YinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jiaxi LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Shiqi ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jingwen GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Shuting QuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Guoting XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Lihe LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jinzhou ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chunfang XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is considered an essential prognosis factor for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), which also affects the treatment strategies of AEG. We aimed to evaluate automated machine learning (AutoML) algorithms for predicting LNM in Siewert type II T1 AEG. Methods: A total of 878 patients with Siewert type II T1 AEG were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to develop the LNM predictive models. The patients from two hospitals in Suzhou were collected as the test set. We applied five machine learning algorithms to develop the LNM prediction models. The performance of predictive models was assessed using various metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve (AUC), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: Patients with LNM exhibited a higher proportion of male individuals, a poor degree of differentiation, and submucosal infiltration, with statistical differences. The deep learning (DL) model demonstrated relatively good accuracy (0.713) and sensitivity (0.868) among the five models. Moreover, the DL model achieved the highest AUC (0.781) and sensitivity (1.000) in the test set. Conclusion: The DL model showed good predictive performance among five AutoML models, indicating the advantage of AutoML in modeling LNM prediction in patients with Siewert type II T1 AEG.

Indexed as

adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG)and End Results (SEER) programEpidemiologylymph node metastasis (LNM)machine learningpredictive modelSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID38633305
PMCPMC11021582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.