Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38633284›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Association Between

Jonathan R Young, Julie A Ressler, Joanne E Mortimer, Daniel Schmolze, Mariko Fitzgibbons, Bihong T Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Association Between the Volume Transfer Constant (KCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Predictive value ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan R YoungDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, 91010 CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-6202
Julie A ResslerDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, 91010 CA USA.
Joanne E MortimerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, 91010 CA USA.
Daniel SchmolzeDepartment of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd, Duarte, 91010 CA USA.
Mariko FitzgibbonsDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, 91010 CA USA.
Bihong T ChenDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd., Duarte, 91010 CA USA.
City of Hope · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether uptake on Methods: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study of a cohort of 14 histologically proven breast cancer brain metastases, we analyzed both preoperative Results: The study cohort was comprised of 12 women with breast cancer with a mean age of 59 years (range: 43-76 years) with a total of 14 distinct brain metastatic lesions. The SUVmax ratio of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases was significantly greater than that of HER2-negative lesions (3.98 vs 1.79, Conclusion: The SUVmax ratio may help to identify the HER2 status of breast cancer brain metastases, if validated prospectively.

Indexed as

Brain metastasisBreast cancerMaximum standardized uptakePositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID38633284
PMCPMC11018722
OpenAlexW4391444861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.