ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Fair non-contact blood pressure estimation using imaging photoplethysmography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the Cuff: State-of-the-Art on Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Remote photoplethysmography for health assessment: a review informed by IntelliProve technology.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Application of Real-Time Palm Imaging with Nelder-Mead Particle Swarm Optimization/Regression Algorithms for Non-Contact Blood Pressure Detection.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fair non-contact blood pressure estimation using imaging photoplethysmography.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is typically manifested as a latent symptom that requires detection through specialized equipment. This poses an inconvenience for individuals who need to undergo long-term blood pressure monitoring in their daily lives. Therefore, there is a need for a portable, non-contact method for estimating blood pressure. However, current non-contact blood pressure estimation methods often rely on relatively narrow datasets, lacking a broad range of blood pressure distributions. Additionally, their applicability is confined to controlled experimental environments. This study proposes a non-contact blood pressure estimation method suitable for various life scenarios, encompassing multiple age groups, diverse ethnicities, and individuals with different skin tones. The aim is to enhance the practicality and accuracy of existing non-contact blood pressure estimation methods. The research extracts the imaging photoplethysmogram (IPPG) signal from facial videos and processes the signal through four layers of filtering operations to obtain an IPPG signal reflecting pulse wave variations. A CNN+BiLSTM+GRU network structure is constructed to improve the accuracy of current non-contact blood pressure estimation methods. In comparison to existing approaches, the mean absolute error (MAE) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is reduced by 13.6% and 16.4%, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.