ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Miniature, multi-dichroic instrument for measuring the concentration of multiple fluorophores.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward handheld optically guided biopsy combining diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and autofluorescence.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Miniature, multi-dichroic instrument for measuring the concentration of multiple fluorophores.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification of tumour margins during resection of the brain is critical for improving the post-operative outcomes. Due to the highly infiltrative nature of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and limited intraoperative visualization of the tumour margin, incomplete surgical resection has been observed to occur in up to 80 % of GBM cases, leading to nearly universal tumour recurrence and overall poor prognosis of 14.6 months median survival. This research presents a miniaturized, SiPMT-based optical system for simultaneous measurement of powerful DRS and weak auto-fluorescence for brain tumour detection. The miniaturisation of the optical elements confined the spatial separation of eight select wavelengths into footprint measuring 1.5 × 2 × 16 mm. The small footprint enables this technology to be integrated with existing surgical guidance instruments in the operating room. It's dynamic ability to subtract any background illumination and measure signal intensities across a broad range from pW to mWs make this design much more suitable for clinical environments as compared to spectrometer-based systems with limited dynamic ranges and high integration times. Measurements using optical tissue phantoms containing mixed fluorophores demonstrate correlation coefficients between the fitted response and actual concentration using PLS regression being 0.95, 0.87 and 0.97 for NADH, FAD and PpIX , respectively. These promising results indicate that our proposed miniaturized instrument could serve as an effective alternative in operating rooms, assisting surgeons in identifying brain tumours to achieving positive surgical outcomes for patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.