Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38632660›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Four-year follow-up of psychiatric and psychosomatic profile in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).

Sara Gostoli, Francesco Ferrara, Ludovica Quintavalle, Sara Tommasino, Graziano Gigante, Maria Montecchiarini, Alessia Urgese, Francesco Guolo, Regina Subach, Angelica D'Oronzo and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara GostoliDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5828-4654
Francesco FerraraGastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ludovica QuintavalleDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sara TommasinoDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Graziano GiganteDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria MontecchiariniDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessia UrgeseDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco GuoloDivision of Cardiology, Bellaria Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Regina SubachDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Angelica D'OronzoDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Annamaria PolifemoGastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federica BuonfiglioliGastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vincenzo CennamoGastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Chiara RafanelliDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. chiara.rafanelli@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-7918
University of Bologna · ITOspedale Bellaria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological characterization of patients affected by Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) focuses on comorbidity with psychiatric disorders, somatization or alexithymia. Whereas IBD patients had higher risk of stable anxiety and depression for many years after the diagnosis of the disease, there is a lack of studies reporting a comprehensive psychosomatic assessment addressing factors of disease vulnerability, also in the long-term. The objective of this investigation is to fill this gap in the current literature. The aims were thus to assess: a) changes between baseline and a 4-year follow-up in psychiatric diagnoses (SCID), psychosomatic syndromes (DCPR), psychological well-being (PWB-I), lifestyle, gastrointestinal symptoms related to IBD and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms b) stability of psychiatric and psychosomatic syndromes at 4-year follow-up. A total of 111 IBD outpatients were enrolled; 59.5% of them participated at the follow-up. A comprehensive assessment, including both interviews and self-report questionnaires, was provided at baseline and follow-up. Results showed increased psychiatric diagnoses, physical activity, consumption of vegetables and IBS-like symptoms at follow-up. Additionally, whereas psychiatric diagnoses were no longer present and new psychopathological pictures ensued at follow-up, more than half of the sample maintained psychosomatic syndromes (particularly allostatic overload, type A behavior, demoralization) from baseline to follow-up. Long-term presence/persistence of such psychosocial burden indicates the need for integrating a comprehensive psychosomatic evaluation beyond traditional psychiatric nosography in IBD patients. Moreover, since psychosomatic syndromes represent vulnerability factors of diseases, further studies should target subgroups of patients presenting with persistent psychosomatic syndromes and worse course of the disease.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesIrritable Bowel SyndromeMental DisordersFollow-Up StudiesHumansPsychophysiologic DisordersDiagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR)Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)Lifestyle behaviorsPsychiatric diagnosesPsychological well-beingPsychosomatic syndromes

Identifiers

PMID38632660
PMCPMC11022322
OpenAlexW4394887526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.