Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38632647›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Theta-burst rTMS in schizophrenia to ameliorate negative and cognitive symptoms: study protocol for a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Gábor Csukly, Boglárka Orbán-Szigeti, Karolin Suri, Réka Zsigmond, Levente Hermán, Viktória Simon, Anita Kabaji, Barnabás Bata, Péter Hársfalvi, Edit Vass and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05100888 (Theta-burst rTMS in Schizophrenia to Ameliorate Negative and Cognitive Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05100888 nacompletednot on this map

Theta-burst rTMS in Schizophrenia to Ameliorate Negative and Cognitive Symptoms: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSemmelweis UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled76ConditionsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive, SchizophreniaArmsrepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An update on the effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gábor CsuklyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary. csugab@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-9407
Boglárka Orbán-SzigetiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Karolin SuriDepartment of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Réka ZsigmondDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Levente HermánDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Viktória SimonDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Anita KabajiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Barnabás BataDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Péter HársfalviDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Edit VassDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Éva CsibriDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Kinga Farkas *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
János Réthelyi *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa 6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HUUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HU

Funding

Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap OTKA FK 138385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment effects of conventional approaches with antipsychotics or psychosocial interventions are limited when it comes to reducing negative and cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia. While there is emerging clinical evidence that new, augmented protocols based on theta-burst stimulation can increase rTMS efficacy dramatically in depression, data on similar augmented therapies are limited in schizophrenia. The different patterns of network impairments in subjects may underlie that some but not all patients responded to given stimulation locations.

methodsTherefore, we propose an augmented theta-burst stimulation protocol in schizophrenia by stimulating both locations connected to negative symptoms: (1) the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and (2) the vermis of the cerebellum. Ninety subjects with schizophrenia presenting negative symptoms and aging between 18 and 55 years will be randomized to active and sham stimulation in a 1:1 ratio. The TBS parameters we adopted follow the standard TBS protocols, with 3-pulse 50-Hz bursts given every 200 ms (at 5 Hz) and an intensity of 100% active motor threshold. We plan to deliver 1800 stimuli to the left DLPFC and 1800 stimuli to the vermis daily in two 9.5-min blocks for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint is the change in negative symptom severity measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Secondary efficacy endpoints are changes in cognitive flexibility, executive functioning, short-term memory, social cognition, and facial emotion recognition. The difference between study groups will be analyzed by a linear mixed model analysis with the difference relative to baseline in efficacy variables as the dependent variable and treatment group, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as independent variables. The safety outcome is the number of serious adverse events. DISCUSSION: This is a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized medical device study to assess the efficacy and safety of an augmented theta-burst rTMS treatment in schizophrenia. We hypothesize that social cognition and negative symptoms of patients on active therapy will improve significantly compared to patients on sham treatment.

trial registrationThe study protocol is registered at "ClinicalTrials.gov" with the following ID: NCT05100888. All items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set are registered. Initial release: 10/19/2021.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaAdolescentAdultCognitionDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCognitive symptomsNegative symptomsSchizophreniaTheta-burstTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38632647
PMCPMC11025264
OpenAlexW4394877756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.