ArticleTrials2024
LapEmerge trial: study protocol for a laparoscopic approach for emergency colon resection-a multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05005117 (Laparoscopic Approach for Emergency Colon Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Laparoscopic Approach for Emergency Colon Resection: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally invasive versus open emergency right-sided colectomy for malignant obstruction: a nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Article
- Emergency minimally invasive colectomy: Approach or reconstructive strategy?Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Early post-operative outcomes in adults undergoing minimally invasive versus open emergency colorectal surgery: A retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- How aging may impact the failure to rescue after colorectal laparoscopic surgery. Analysis of 1000 patients in a single high-volume center.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Colectomy for Complicated Colorectal Disease in Emergency Settings.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to faster recovery and lower morbidity rates, laparoscopy has become the gold standard in elective colorectal surgery for both the benign and malignant forms of the disease. A substantial proportion of colorectal operations are, however, carried out in emergency settings, and most of the emergency resections are still performed open. The aim of this study is to compare the laparoscopic versus open approach for emergency colorectal surgery. METHOD/
designThis is a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial including adult patients presenting with a condition requiring emergency colorectal resection. DISCUSSION: Previous studies cautiously recommend wider use of laparoscopy in emergency colorectal resections, but all earlier reports are retrospective, are mostly single-center studies, and have limited numbers of patients. Laparoscopy may involve some unpredictable risks that have not yet been reported because of the infrequent use of the techniqueded to assess the safety of laparoscopy as well as the advantages and disadvantages of open compared with laparoscopic emergency surgery.
trial registrationTrial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05005117 . Registered on August 12, 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.