Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38632413›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2024

Neuroimaging of posttraumatic stress disorder in adults and youth: progress over the last decade on three leading questions of the field.

Cecilia A Hinojosa, Grace C George, Ziv Ben-Zion

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cecilia A HinojosaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. cecilia.a.hinojosa@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2577-6142
Grace C GeorgeDepartment of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
Ziv Ben-ZionDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3629-5851

Funding

Training to Enhance Alignment of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceT32MH125786 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI William A. Carlezon, KERRY J. RESSLER · 2021 to 2026
$2.0M
Sex differences in reward neurocircuitry underlying alcohol craving and consumption in trauma-exposed individualsK99AA031333 · NIAAA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HINOJOSA, CECILIA A · 2023 to 2024
$270k
NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA031333NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH125786U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) T32MH125786U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) K99AA031333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost three decades have passed since the first posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) neuroimaging study was published. Since then, the field of clinical neuroscience has made advancements in understanding the neural correlates of PTSD to create more efficacious treatment strategies. While gold-standard psychotherapy options are available, many patients do not respond to them, prematurely drop out, or never initiate treatment. Therefore, elucidating the neurobiological mechanisms that define the disorder can help guide clinician decision-making and develop individualized mechanisms-based treatment options. To this end, this narrative review highlights progress made in the last decade in adult and youth samples on three outstanding questions in PTSD research: (1) Which neural alterations serve as predisposing (pre-exposure) risk factors for PTSD development, and which are acquired (post-exposure) alterations? (2) Which neural alterations can predict treatment outcomes and define clinical improvement? and (3) Can neuroimaging measures be used to define brain-based biotypes of PTSD? While the studies highlighted in this review have made progress in answering the three questions, the field still has much to do before implementing these findings into clinical practice. Overall, to better answer these questions, we suggest that future neuroimaging studies of PTSD should (A) utilize prospective longitudinal designs, collecting brain measures before experiencing trauma and at multiple follow-up time points post-trauma, taking advantage of multi-site collaborations/consortiums; (B) collect two scans to explore changes in brain alterations from pre-to-post treatment and compare changes in neural activation between treatment groups, including longitudinal follow up assessments; and (C) replicate brain-based biotypes of PTSD. By synthesizing recent findings, this narrative review will pave the way for personalized treatment approaches grounded in neurobiological evidence.

Indexed as

BrainNeuroimagingStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdolescentAdultHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38632413
PMCPMC11449801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.