ArticleScientific reports2024
Non-animal models for blood-brain barrier permeability evaluation of drug-like compounds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overrepresentation Bias Leads to Performance Overestimation in Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Prediction Models: Characterization and Mitigation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Identification of a Potential Dual-Target Candidate Against RSV F Protein and 15-LOX from TCMSP: Integrating Virtual Screening, Molecular Dynamics, and Experimental Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- From Polyphenols to Prodrugs: Bridging the Blood-Brain Barrier with Nanomedicine and Neurotherapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development of a succinyl CoA:3-ketoacid CoA transferase inhibitor selective for peripheral tissues that improves glycemia in obesity.iScience · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Drug Development for Neurological Diseases: A Review of Blood Brain Barrier Permeability Prediction Models.Molecular informatics · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diseases related to the central nervous system (CNS) are major health concerns and have serious social and economic impacts. Developing new drugs for CNS-related disorders presents a major challenge as it actively involves delivering drugs into the CNS. Therefore, it is imperative to develop in silico methodologies to reliably identify potential lead compounds that can penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and help to thoroughly understand the role of different physicochemical properties fundamental to the BBB permeation of molecules. In this study, we have analysed the chemical space of the CNS drugs and compared it to the non-CNS-approved drugs. Additionally, we have collected a feature selection dataset from Muehlbacher et al. (J Comput Aided Mol Des 25(12):1095-1106, 2011. 10.1007/s10822-011-9478-1) and an in-house dataset. This information was utilised to design a molecular fingerprint that was used to train machine learning (ML) models. The best-performing models reported in this study achieved accuracies of 0.997 and 0.98, sensitivities of 1.0 and 0.992, specificities of 0.971 and 0.962, MCCs of 0.984 and 0.958, and ROC-AUCs of 0.997 and 0.999 on an imbalanced and a balanced dataset, respectively. They demonstrated overall good accuracies and sensitivities in the blind validation dataset. The reported models can be applied for fast and early screening drug-like molecules with BBB potential. Furthermore, the bbbPythoN package can be used by the research community to both produce the BBB-specific molecular fingerprints and employ the models mentioned earlier for BBB-permeability prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.