ArticleScientific reports2024
A comparative study on eDNA-based detection of Siamese bat catfish (Oreoglanis siamensis) in wet and dry conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Rainfall on Aquatic and Terrestrial Species Monitoring Using Riverine Environmental DNA.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Rainfall has contrasting effects on aquatic and terrestrial environmental DNA recovered from streams.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
- Article
- Molecular epidemiology of aquatic environments: challenges from sampling to implementation of surveillance programs.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has demonstrated notable efficacy in detecting the existence of freshwater species, including those that are endangered or uncommon. This application holds significant potential for enhancing environmental monitoring and management efforts. However, the efficacy of eDNA-based detection relies on several factors. In this study, we assessed the impact of rainfall on the detection of eDNA for the Siamese bat catfish (Oreoglanis siamensis). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis indicated that samples from days with average rainfall exceeding 35 mm (classified as heavy and very heavy rain) yielded negative results. While eDNA detection remains feasible on light or moderate rainy days, a noteworthy reduction in eDNA concentration and qPCR-positive likelihood was observed. Analysis across 12 sampling sites established a statistically significant negative relationship (p < 0.001) between eDNA detection and rainfall. Specifically, for each 1 mm increase in rainfall, there was an observed drop in eDNA concentration of 0.19 copies/mL (±0.14). The findings of this study provide definitive evidence that precipitation has a significant impact on the detection of eDNA in Siamese bat catfish. However, in the case of adverse weather conditions occurring on the day of sampling, our research indicates that it is acceptable to continue with the task, as long as the rainfall is not heavy or very heavy. To enhance the effectiveness of an eDNA survey, it is crucial to consider many factors related to climatic conditions. The aforementioned factor holds significant importance not only for the specific species under scrutiny but also for the broader dynamics of the climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.