Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38632261›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Efficacy of a new refractive multifocal contact lens for presbyopia.

Do Young Kim, Hyunmin Ahn, Sukyung Lee, Ikhyun Jun, Kyoung Yul Seo, Sang Yeop Kim, Tae-Im Kim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07373574 (Effects of the Dietary Supplements, Congaplex® and Immuplex®, on Age-Related Changes in Fingernail and Hair Health), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07373574 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of the Dietary Supplements, Congaplex® and Immuplex®, on Age-Related Changes in Fingernail and Hair Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorStandard Process Inc.Ran2026 to 2027Enrolled0ConditionsNutrient Intake, Nutrient Intake InadequacyArmsImmune Health (Congaplex), Active Control (Gastro-Fiber), Immune Health (Immuplex)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Do Young KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Hyunmin AhnEyejun Ophthalmic Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sukyung LeeYonsei Plus Eye Center, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Ikhyun JunDepartment of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Kyoung Yul SeoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Sang Yeop KimClear Eye Clinic, Pyeongtaek, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Im KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea. TIKIM@yuhs.ac.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective single-arm study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a refractive multifocal contact lens for the correction of presbyopia in 22 patients. The participants underwent clinical examinations before and 1 week after wearing a refractive multifocal contact lens (OptaCon ZOOM). The primary endpoints were the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA). Defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) were analyzed. A slit-lamp examination was performed for safety analysis. Contact lens comfort and patient satisfaction were assessed using a questionnaire. No significant difference in CDVA was observed before and 1 week after refractive multifocal contact lens use (p = 0.127), whereas DCNVA was significantly improved after 1 week (p < 0.001). The contrast sensitivity was not significantly affected at any spatial frequency under mesopic or photopic conditions. OSDI was significantly increased (p = 0.023). The patient-reported satisfaction scores were 96.2, 91.9, and 85.0 out of 100 at far, intermediate, and near distances, respectively. No significant adverse events were observed. Refractive multifocal contact lenses improved near vision while maintaining distance vision in presbyopic patients, without compromising contrast sensitivity. The study results suggest that OptaCon ZOOM can be considered safe and effective for the correction of presbyopia.

Indexed as

Contact LensesPresbyopiaHumansProspective StudiesRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityContact lensMultifocal lensPresbyopia

Identifiers

PMID38632261
PMCPMC11024154
OpenAlexW4394891239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.