Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38632256›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Clinical decision making when cytology indicates a Warthin tumor.

Minna Sirviö, Katri Aro, Mira Naukkarinen, Antti Mäkitie, Jussi Tarkkanen, Jetta Kelppe, Timo Atula

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Minna SirviöDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Kasarmikatu 11-13, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland. minna.m.sirvio@hus.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-4072-7971
Katri AroDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Kasarmikatu 11-13, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8103-5237
Mira NaukkarinenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Kasarmikatu 11-13, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0009-0008-3484-7417
Antti MäkitieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Kasarmikatu 11-13, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0451-2404
Jussi TarkkanenPathology, Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5807-1085
Jetta KelppePathology, Helsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6690-9012
Timo AtulaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Kasarmikatu 11-13, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6560-1128
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warthin tumor (WT) is a benign tumor usually affecting the parotid gland. The main diagnostic tool remains ultrasound combined with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). This study aims to examine how reliably FNAC indicates WT for clinical decision making regarding surgical versus conservative management. We included all patients who underwent FNAC from a parotid gland lesion between 2016 and 2018 at our institution, and whose FNAC revealed WT suspicion. The FNACs were divided into three groups based on the cytology report: certain, likely, and possible WT. The patients were divided into two groups based on having had either surgery or follow-up. We sent a questionnaire to patients who had not undergone surgery in order to obtain follow-up for a minimum of four years. Altogether, 135 FNAC samples, from 133 tumors and 125 patients, showed signs of WT. Of the 125 patients, 44 (35%) underwent surgery, and 81 (65%) were managed conservatively. Preoperative misdiagnosis in FNAC occurred in three (7%) surgically treated tumors. Their FNACs were reported as possible WTs, but histopathology revealed another benign lesion. In the conservatively treated group, two patients underwent surgery later during the follow-up. Cytological statements of WT were seldom false, and none were malignant. The majority of the patients were only followed-up and rarely required further treatment. A certain or likely diagnosis of WT in the FNAC report by an experienced head and neck pathologist is highly reliable in selecting patients for conservative surveillance.

Indexed as

AdenolymphomaParotid NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingHumansParotid GlandRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID38632256
PMCPMC11023945
OpenAlexW4394886495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.