ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2024
Isolation of vapB-positive Rhodococcus equi from submaxillary lymph nodes with or without granulomatous lesions in growing-finishing pigs in Japan.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptations in electron transport chain complexes of clinical Rhodococcus equi revealed through comparative genomics.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Plasmidial virulence of Rhodococcus equi and its implications of livestock infections for human health: a possible foodborne pathogen?Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the etiological role of vapB-positive Rhodococcus equi in pigs, R. equi was isolated from the submaxillary lymph nodes with or without macroscopically detectable lesions of apparently healthy growing-finishing pigs at a slaughterhouse in Toyama Prefecture, Japan. R. equi was isolated from 57 (24.6%) of 232 pigs with macroscopically detectable lymph node lesions, and 56 (98.2%) of the 57 isolates were vapB-positive. R. equi was isolated from 10 (2.4%) of 420 pigs without lymph node lesions, and six (60%) of the 10 isolates were vapB-positive. Plasmid DNA was isolated from the 62 vapB-positive isolates and digested with EcoRI and NsiI to obtain the plasmid profile. Fifty-two (83.9%), three (4.8%), and four (6.5%) isolates contained pVAPB subtypes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, while the remaining three isolates were of pVAPB subtypes 9, 13, and 14, respectively. Twelve specimens from lymph nodes with macroscopically detectable lesions were randomly selected for histopathological staining. Granulomatous lesions resembling tuberculosis were found in 11 of the 12 specimens, and the remaining specimen showed typical foci of malakoplakia in the lymph node. The isolation rates of R. equi and vapB-positive R. equi from lymph nodes with macroscopically detectable lesions were significantly higher (P<0.05) than those of lymph nodes without lesions, suggesting an etiologic association between vapB-positive R. equi and macroscopically detectable granulomatous lesions in porcine submaxillary lymph nodes. Previous reports on the prevalence of vapB-positive R. equi in pigs are reviewed and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.