Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38631834›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Linking genetic counseling communication skills to patient outcomes and experiences using a community-engagement and provider-engagement approach: research protocol for the GC-PRO mixed methods sequential explanatory study.

Elena R Fisher, Deborah Cragun, Robert F Dedrick, Crystal Y Lumpkins, Mariana Ramírez, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Ashley Petersen, Ian M MacFarlane, Krista Redlinger-Grosse, Abdirashid Shire and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elena R FisherGenetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7560-1826
Deborah CragunUniversity of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Robert F DedrickEducational and Psychological Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Crystal Y LumpkinsHuntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Mariana RamírezJUNTOS Center for Advancing Latino Health, University of Kansas Medical Center Department of Population Health, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Kimberly A KaphingstHuntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Ashley PetersenUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Ian M MacFarlaneGenetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Krista Redlinger-GrosseGenetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Abdirashid ShireShire Scientific, LLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Kathleen A Culhane-PeraSoLaHmo Partnership for Health and Wellness, Community-University Health Care Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Heather A ZierhutGenetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA zier0034@umn.edu.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Genetic Counseling Processes Result in Outcomes (GC-PRO) StudyR01HG011916 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ZIERHUT, HEATHER · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn over 50 years since the genetic counseling (GC) profession began, a systematic study of GC communication skills and patient-reported outcomes in actual sessions across multiple clinical specialties has never been conducted. To optimize GC quality and improve efficiency of care, the field must first be able to comprehensively measure GC skills and determine which skills are most critical to achieving positive patient experiences and outcomes. This study aims to characterise GC communication skills using a novel and pragmatic measure and link variations in communication skills to patient-reported outcomes, across clinical specialties and with patients from diverse backgrounds in the USA. Our community-engagement and provider-engagement approach is crucial to develop recommendations for quality, culturally informed GC care, which are greatly needed to improve GC practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed methods, sequential explanatory design will be used to collect and analyze: audio-recorded GC sessions in cancer, cardiac, and prenatal/reproductive genetic indications; pre-visit and post-visit quantitative surveys capturing patient experiences and outcomes and post-visit qualitative interview data. A novel, practical checklist will measure GC communication skills. Coincidence analysis will identify patterns of GC skills that are consistent with high scores on patient-reported measures. Two-level, multilevel models will be used to evaluate how GC communication skills and other session/patient characteristics predict patient-reported outcomes. Four community advisory boards (CABs) and a genetic counselor advisory board will inform the study design and analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the single Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota. This research poses no greater than minimal risk to participants. Results from this study will be shared through national and international conferences and through community-based dissemination as guided by the study's CABs. A lay summary will also be disseminated to all participants.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingNeoplasmsCommunicationHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresResearchCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchGENETICSHealth ServicesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProtocols & guidelinesQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID38631834
PMCPMC11029319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.