ArticleBrain stimulation
Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities.
Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- EFMouse: A toolbox to model stimulation-induced electric fields in the mouse brain.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Repeated tDCS at Clinically Relevant Field Intensity Can Boost Concurrent Motor Learning in Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Cathodal weak direct current decreases epileptic excitability with reduced neuronal activity and enhanced delta oscillations.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Repetitive prefrontal tDCS activates VTA dopaminergic neurons, resulting in attenuation of Alzheimer's Disease-like deficits in Tg2576 mice.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Optimising transcranial direct current stimulation application for the enhancement of exercise performance: a review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Dose-response of tDCS effects on motor learning and cortical excitability: A preregistered study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Inkjet-printed transparent electrodes: Design, characterization, and initial in vivo evaluation for brain stimulation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Understanding the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the neurovascular unit: a narrative review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Preclinical insights into gamma-tACS: foundations for clinical translation in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Modulating excitation/inhibition balance through transcranial electrical stimulation: physiological mechanisms in animal models.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Simultaneous tDCS-fMRI reveals limited and inconsistent changes in functional connectivity: Insights from a temporal dynamics study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
- Subthreshold electric fields bidirectionally modulate neurotransmitter release through axon polarization.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNotwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function.
objectiveTo measure electric fields magnitude and their effects on neuronal firing rate of hippocampal neurons in freely moving rats, and to establish calibrated computational models of current flow.
methodsCurrent flow models were calibrated on electric field measures in the motor cortex (n = 2 anesthetized rats) and hippocampus. A Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels was used in an in-vivo rat model of tES (n = 4 freely moving and 2 urethane anesthetized rats) to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents).
resultsElectric fields of as low as 0.35 V/m (0.25-0.47) acutely modulated average firing rate in the hippocampus. At these intensities, firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 11.5 % per V/m (7.2-18.3). For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for soma-depolarizing stimulation and diminished for soma-hyperpolarizing stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive.
conclusionIn awake animals, electric fields modulate spiking rate above levels previously observed in vitro. Firing rate effects are likely mediated by somatic polarization of pyramidal neurons. We recommend that all future rodent experiments directly measure electric fields to insure rigor and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.