Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38631548›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities.

Forouzan Farahani, Niranjan Khadka, Lucas C Parra, Marom Bikson, Mihály Vöröslakos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Repeated tDCS at Clinically Relevant Field Intensity Can Boost Concurrent Motor Learning in Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Forouzan FarahaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Niranjan KhadkaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Lucas C ParraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Marom BiksonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Mihály VöröslakosNeuroscience Institute and Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: mihaly.voroslakos@nyulangone.org.
City College of New York · USNew York University · US

Funding

Interaction of Motor Learning with Transcranial Direct Current - Efficacy and MechanismsR01NS130484 · NINDS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI John H Martin, LUCAS C PARRA · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS130484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNotwithstanding advances with low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), there remain questions about the efficacy of clinically realistic electric fields on neuronal function.

objectiveTo measure electric fields magnitude and their effects on neuronal firing rate of hippocampal neurons in freely moving rats, and to establish calibrated computational models of current flow.

methodsCurrent flow models were calibrated on electric field measures in the motor cortex (n = 2 anesthetized rats) and hippocampus. A Neuropixels 2.0 probe with 384 channels was used in an in-vivo rat model of tES (n = 4 freely moving and 2 urethane anesthetized rats) to detect effects of weak fields on neuronal firing rate. High-density field mapping and computational models verified field intensity (1 V/m in hippocampus per 50 μA of applied skull currents).

resultsElectric fields of as low as 0.35 V/m (0.25-0.47) acutely modulated average firing rate in the hippocampus. At these intensities, firing rate effects increased monotonically with electric field intensity at a rate of 11.5 % per V/m (7.2-18.3). For the majority of excitatory neurons, firing increased for soma-depolarizing stimulation and diminished for soma-hyperpolarizing stimulation. While more diverse, the response of inhibitory neurons followed a similar pattern on average, likely as a result of excitatory drive.

conclusionIn awake animals, electric fields modulate spiking rate above levels previously observed in vitro. Firing rate effects are likely mediated by somatic polarization of pyramidal neurons. We recommend that all future rodent experiments directly measure electric fields to insure rigor and reproducibility.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsHippocampusNeuronsTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAnimalsMaleMotor CortexRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyComputational modelingSingle-unit effectsTranscranial electric stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38631548
PMCPMC466978
OpenAlexW4394824211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.