Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38631380›Full record

Trial reportApplied clinical informatics2024

Identifying Barriers to The Implementation of Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by Registered Nurses, An Early Warning System SmartApp.

Mollie Hobensack, Jennifer Withall, Brian Douthit, Kenrick Cato, Patricia Dykes, Sandy Cho, Graham Lowenthal, Catherine Ivory, Po-Yin Yen, Sarah Rossetti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Applied clinical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mollie HobensackBrookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, United States.
Jennifer WithallDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States.
Brian DouthitDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Kenrick CatoDepartment of Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Patricia DykesDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Sandy ChoDepartment of Clinical Informatics, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, United States.
Graham LowenthalBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Catherine IvoryVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Po-Yin YenWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Sarah RossettiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States.

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN)R01NR016941 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Kenrick Dwain Cato, Sarah Collins Rossetti · 2017 to 2026
$6.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016941NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses are at the frontline of detecting patient deterioration. We developed Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by Registered Nurses (CONCERN), an early warning system for clinical deterioration that generates a risk prediction score utilizing nursing data. CONCERN was implemented as a randomized clinical trial at two health systems in the Northeastern United States. Following the implementation of CONCERN, our team sought to develop the CONCERN Implementation Toolkit to enable other hospital systems to adopt CONCERN.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify the optimal resources needed to implement CONCERN and package these resources into the CONCERN Implementation Toolkit to enable the spread of CONCERN to other hospital sites.

methodsTo accomplish this aim, we conducted qualitative interviews with nurses, prescribing providers, and information technology experts in two health systems. We recruited participants from July 2022 to January 2023. We conducted thematic analysis guided by the Donabedian model. Based on the results of the thematic analysis, we updated the α version of the CONCERN Implementation Toolkit.

resultsThere was a total of 32 participants included in our study. In total, 12 themes were identified, with four themes mapping to each domain in Donabedian's model (i.e., structure, process, and outcome). Eight new resources were added to the CONCERN Implementation Toolkit.

conclusionsThis study validated the α version of the CONCERN Implementation Toolkit. Future studies will focus on returning the results of the Toolkit to the hospital sites to validate the β version of the CONCERN Implementation Toolkit. As the development of early warning systems continues to increase and clinician workflows evolve, the results of this study will provide considerations for research teams interested in implementing early warning systems in the acute care setting.

Indexed as

NursesHumans

Identifiers

PMID38631380
PMCPMC11023711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.