ArticleActa cytologica2024
Challenges and Pitfalls in Pancreatobiliary Cytopathology.
Article in Acta cytologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-keratinizing immature squamous metaplasia in the pancreas mimicking malignancy: a diagnostic pitfall in cytology.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Intraoperative indeterminate frozen-section margin leading to an unintended R1 resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and decision-making framework.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Value of Cytology in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Accuracy in Common Epithelial Pancreatobiliary Tumors and the Role of Cell Block Analysis.Iranian journal of pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe advances of minimally invasive endoscopy-guided procedures that usually yield limited diagnostic material changed pancreaticobiliary cytopathology into one of the most challenging areas of cytopathology given the abundance of differential diagnoses to be considered when dealing with limited specimens. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a few challenging examples of potential pitfalls in pancreatobiliary cytopathology evaluation collected from a busy academic hospital (tertiary) center. Case 1 illustrates the challenges in handling paucicellular specimens from pancreatic solid lesions in which differential diagnoses may include acinar cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, adenocarcinoma, or even benign pancreatic tissue, among others. Case 2 illustrates the pitfalls in evaluating limited specimens from patients with chronic pancreatitis, specially when distinguishing exuberant reactive atypia from dysplastic changes is mandatory. Case 3 illustrates pitfalls in distinguishing malignancy from reactive changes in biliary brushing specimens from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Finally, cases 4 and 5 highlight the importance of including the possibility of pancreatic metastasis in the differential diagnoses of some pancreatic lesions.
conclusionOver time, there has been an increasing demand for pathologists to render diagnoses on limited specimens obtained through minimally invasive procedures which can be frequently challenging even for the most experienced professionals. In many difficult cases, salvaging additional material for a cell block can turn out to be extremely helpful given the possibility of utilizing additional ancillary tests for diagnostic confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.