Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630835›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Encoding surprise by retinal ganglion cells.

Danica Despotović, Corentin Joffrois, Olivier Marre, Matthew Chalk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danica DespotovićInstitut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8213-0372
Corentin JoffroisInstitut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Olivier MarreInstitut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Matthew ChalkInstitut de la Vision, INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7782-4436
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) OPC-17-CE37-0013-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) RETNET4ECERC Consolidator grant DEEPRETINA 101045253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficient coding hypothesis posits that early sensory neurons transmit maximal information about sensory stimuli, given internal constraints. A central prediction of this theory is that neurons should preferentially encode stimuli that are most surprising. Previous studies suggest this may be the case in early visual areas, where many neurons respond strongly to rare or surprising stimuli. For example, previous research showed that when presented with a rhythmic sequence of full-field flashes, many retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) respond strongly at the instance the flash sequence stops, and when another flash would be expected. This phenomenon is called the 'omitted stimulus response'. However, it is not known whether the responses of these cells varies in a graded way depending on the level of stimulus surprise. To investigate this, we presented retinal neurons with extended sequences of stochastic flashes. With this stimulus, the surprise associated with a particular flash/silence, could be quantified analytically, and varied in a graded manner depending on the previous sequences of flashes and silences. Interestingly, we found that RGC responses could be well explained by a simple normative model, which described how they optimally combined their prior expectations and recent stimulus history, so as to encode surprise. Further, much of the diversity in RGC responses could be explained by the model, due to the different prior expectations that different neurons had about the stimulus statistics. These results suggest that even as early as the retina many cells encode surprise, relative to their own, internally generated expectations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalPhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsAnimalsComputational Biology

Identifiers

PMID38630835
PMCPMC11057717
OpenAlexW4394872732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.