Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630811›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Last Glacial Maximum pattern effects reduce climate sensitivity estimates.

Vincent T Cooper, Kyle C Armour, Gregory J Hakim, Jessica E Tierney, Matthew B Osman, Cristian Proistosescu, Yue Dong, Natalie J Burls, Timothy Andrews, Daniel E Amrhein and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Paleoclimate pattern effects help constrain climate sensitivity and 21st-century warming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating ecosystem caps on fishery yield in the context of climate stress and predation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vincent T CooperDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-1992
Kyle C ArmourDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6833-5179
Gregory J HakimDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8486-9739
Jessica E TierneyDepartment of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9080-9289
Matthew B OsmanDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5636-698X
Cristian ProistosescuDepartment of Climate, Meteorology, and Atmospheric Sciences and Department of Earth Sciences and Environmental Change, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1717-124X
Yue DongCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Natalie J BurlsDepartment of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Earth Sciences, Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6950-3808
Timothy AndrewsMet Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8248-8753
Daniel E AmrheinClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8442-1528
Jiang ZhuClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0908-5130
Wenhao DongCooperative Programs for the Advancement of Earth System Science, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5662-5435
Yi MingEarth and Environmental Sciences and Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-1305
Philip ChmielowiecDepartment of Climate, Meteorology, and Atmospheric Sciences and Department of Earth Sciences and Environmental Change, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we show that the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) provides a stronger constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), the global warming from increasing greenhouse gases, after accounting for temperature patterns. Feedbacks governing ECS depend on spatial patterns of surface temperature ("pattern effects"); hence, using the LGM to constrain future warming requires quantifying how temperature patterns produce different feedbacks during LGM cooling versus modern-day warming. Combining data assimilation reconstructions with atmospheric models, we show that the climate is more sensitive to LGM forcing because ice sheets amplify extratropical cooling where feedbacks are destabilizing. Accounting for LGM pattern effects yields a median modern-day ECS of 2.4°C, 66% range 1.7° to 3.5°C (1.4° to 5.0°C, 5 to 95%), from LGM evidence alone. Combining the LGM with other lines of evidence, the best estimate becomes 2.9°C, 66% range 2.4° to 3.5°C (2.1° to 4.1°C, 5 to 95%), substantially narrowing uncertainty compared to recent assessments.

Identifiers

PMID38630811
PMCPMC11023557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.