Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630747›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Perinatal mortality in German dairy cattle: Unveiling the importance of cow-level risk factors and their interactions using a multifaceted modelling approach.

Yury Zablotski, Katja Voigt, Martina Hoedemaker, Kerstin E Müller, Laura Kellermann, Heidi Arndt, Maria Volkmann, Linda Dachrodt, Annegret Stock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yury ZablotskiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6928-4089
Katja VoigtFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Martina HoedemakerClinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Kerstin E MüllerFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Laura KellermannFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3423-8717
Heidi ArndtClinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8895-6151
Maria VolkmannFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Linda DachrodtClinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Annegret StockFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Ruminants, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal mortality (PM) is a common issue on dairy farms, leading to calf losses and increased farming costs. The current knowledge about PM in dairy cattle is, however, limited and previous studies lack comparability. The topic has also primarily been studied in Holstein-Friesian cows and closely related breeds, while other dairy breeds have been largely ignored. Different data collection techniques, definitions of PM, studied variables and statistical approaches further limit the comparability and interpretation of previous studies. This article aims to investigate the factors contributing to PM in two underexplored breeds, Simmental (SIM) and Brown Swiss (BS), while comparing them to German Holstein on German farms, and to employ various modelling techniques to enhance comparability to other studies, and to determine if different statistical methods yield consistent results. A total of 133,942 calving records from 131,657 cows on 721 German farms were analyzed. Amongst these, the proportion of PM (defined as stillbirth or death up to 48 hours of age) was 6.1%. Univariable and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regressions, random forest and multimodel inference via brute-force model selection approaches were used to evaluate risk factors on the individual animal level. Although the balanced random forest did not incorporate the random effect, it yielded results similar to those of the mixed-effect model. The brute-force approach surpassed the widely adopted backwards variable selection method and represented a combination of strengths: it accounted for the random effect similar to mixed-effects regression and generated a variable importance plot similar to random forest. The difficulty of calving, breed and parity of the cow were found to be the most important factors, followed by farm size and season. Additionally, four significant interactions amongst predictors were identified: breed-calving ease, breed-season, parity-season and calving ease-farm size. The combination of factors, such as secondiparous SIM breed on small farms and experiencing easy calving in summer, showed the lowest probability of PM. Conversely, primiparous GH cows on large farms with difficult calving in winter exhibited the highest probability of PM. In order to reduce PM, appropriate management of dystocia, optimal heifer management and a wider use of SIM in dairy production are possible ways forward. It is also important that future studies are conducted to identify farm-specific contributors to higher PM on large farms.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesDystociaPerinatal DeathAnimalsCattleFemaleHumansLactationMilkPerinatal MortalityPregnancyRisk FactorsStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID38630747
PMCPMC11023303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.