Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630714›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The olivary input to the cerebellum dissociates sensory events from movement plans.

Jay S Pi, Mohammad Amin Fakharian, Paul Hage, Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad, Salomon Z Muller, Reza Shadmehr

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Critical period plasticity enables credit assignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Coordination of spike timing among the neurons of the cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Control of tongue movements by the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jay S PiLaboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA 21205.ORCID 0000-0003-4036-2877
Mohammad Amin FakharianLaboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA 21205.
Paul HageLaboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA 21205.ORCID 0000-0002-7006-9877
Ehsan Sedaghat-NejadLaboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA 21205.ORCID 0000-0001-6732-1296
Salomon Z MullerZuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.ORCID 0000-0003-2533-3592
Reza ShadmehrLaboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA 21205.ORCID 0000-0002-7686-2569
Johns Hopkins University · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Control of movements by the cerebellumR37NS128416 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI REZA SHADMEHR · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
A new theory of population coding in the cerebellumR01EB028156 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHADMEHR, REZA · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028156NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS128416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in the inferior olive are thought to anatomically organize the Purkinje cells (P-cells) of the cerebellum into computational modules, but what is computed by each module? Here, we designed a saccade task in marmosets that dissociated sensory events from motor events and then recorded the complex and simple spikes of hundreds of P-cells. We found that when a visual target was presented at a random location, the olive reported the direction of that sensory event to one group of P-cells, but not to a second group. However, just before movement onset, it reported the direction of the planned movement to both groups, even if that movement was not toward the target. At the end of the movement if the subject experienced an error but chose to withhold the corrective movement, only the first group received information about the sensory prediction error. We organized the P-cells based on the information content of their olivary input and found that in the group that received sensory information, the simple spikes were suppressed during fixation, then produced a burst before saccade onset in a direction consistent with assisting the movement. In the second group, the simple spikes were not suppressed during fixation but burst near saccade deceleration in a direction consistent with stopping the movement. Thus, the olive differentiated the P-cells based on whether they would receive sensory or motor information, and this defined their contributions to control of movements as well as holding still.

Indexed as

CerebellumPurkinje CellsMovementNeuronsSaccadescerebellummarmosetsaccade

Identifiers

PMID38630714
PMCPMC11047103
OpenAlexW4394892549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.