ArticlePloS one2024
Carpal tunnel syndrome prediction with machine learning algorithms using anthropometric and strength-based measurement.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: An Umbrella Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of high- and low-dose radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Trial
- Predicting the risk of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis using a SHAP-based interpretable machine learning model.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Explainable Ensemble Learning for Robust Severity Stratification of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from Clinical Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for paresthesia improvement after open carpal tunnel release: a preliminary study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Development of a machine learning model using structured and unstructured features for predicting surgery among patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: development and validation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The interplay of risk factors for future falls and fall-related injuries among community-dwelling older adults: a Bayesian network analysis.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Body surface area-adjusted median nerve cross-sectional area and multimodal ultrasound improve diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Development of a predictive model for adverse outcomes after unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation using six interpretable machine learning models.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Assessment of the Value of Vertebral Structural Parameters in Predicting Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures on Opportunistic CT Scans.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Hand Surgery: The Future is Upon Us.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Review
- Machine learning applications in forecasting patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes after carpal tunnel release: a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Predicting the Recurrence of Sporadic Odontogenic Keratocyst Using Whole-Slide Histopathology Images With the Hybrid Encoder Iterative Attention Convolution Model.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of electrophysiological examinations for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Intraoperative change in distal motor latency as a predictor for clinical outcome after mini-OCTR: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) stands as the most prevalent upper extremity entrapment neuropathy, with a multifaceted etiology encompassing various risk factors. This study aimed to investigate whether anthropometric measurements of the hand, grip strength, and pinch strength could serve as predictive indicators for CTS through machine learning techniques.
methodsEnrollment encompassed patients exhibiting CTS symptoms (n = 56) and asymptomatic healthy controls (n = 56), with confirmation via electrophysiological assessments. Anthropometric measurements of the hand were obtained using a digital caliper, grip strength was gauged via a digital handgrip dynamometer, and pinch strengths were assessed using a pinchmeter. A comprehensive analysis was conducted employing four most common and effective machine learning algorithms, integrating thorough parameter tuning and cross-validation procedures. Additionally, the outcomes of variable importance were presented.
resultsAmong the diverse algorithms, Random Forests (accuracy of 89.474%, F1-score of 0.905, and kappa value of 0.789) and XGBoost (accuracy of 86.842%, F1-score of 0.878, and kappa value of 0.736) emerged as the top-performing choices based on distinct classification metrics. In addition, using variable importance calculations specific to these models, the most important variables were found to be wrist circumference, hand width, hand grip strength, tip pinch, key pinch, and middle finger length.
conclusionThe findings of this study demonstrated that wrist circumference, hand width, hand grip strength, tip pinch, key pinch, and middle finger length can be utilized as reliable indicators of CTS. Also, the model developed herein, along with the identified crucial variables, could serve as an informative guide for healthcare professionals, enhancing precision and efficacy in CTS prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.