ArticlePloS one2024
An orchestra of machine learning methods reveals landmarks in single-cell data exemplified with aging fibroblasts.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- DataXflowGen for GenAI-driven model generation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Correction: An orchestra of machine learning methods reveals landmarks in single-cell data exemplified with aging fibroblasts.PloS one · 2025Article
- gSELECT: A novel pre-analysis machine-learning library enabling early hypothesis testing and predictive gene selection in single-cell data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Mathematical strategies for predicting resistant subpopulations from scRNAseq data of a PANC-1 3D tissue model: Insight into gemcitabine resistance and TGFB1-induced invasion and EMT.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- DataXflow: Synergizing data-driven modeling with best parameter fit and optimal control - An efficient data analysis for cancer research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, a Python framework for characteristic feature extraction is developed and applied to gene expression data of human fibroblasts. Unlabeled feature selection objectively determines groups and minimal gene sets separating groups. ML explainability methods transform the features correlating with phenotypic differences into causal reasoning, supported by further pipeline and visualization tools, allowing user knowledge to boost causal reasoning. The purpose of the framework is to identify characteristic features that are causally related to phenotypic differences of single cells. The pipeline consists of several data science methods enriched with purposeful visualization of the intermediate results in order to check them systematically and infuse the domain knowledge about the investigated process. A specific focus is to extract a small but meaningful set of genes to facilitate causal reasoning for the phenotypic differences. One application could be drug target identification. For this purpose, the framework follows different steps: feature reduction (PFA), low dimensional embedding (UMAP), clustering ((H)DBSCAN), feature correlation (chi-square, mutual information), ML validation and explainability (SHAP, tree explainer). The pipeline is validated by identifying and correctly separating signature genes associated with aging in fibroblasts from single-cell gene expression measurements: PLK3, polo-like protein kinase 3; CCDC88A, Coiled-Coil Domain Containing 88A; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription-3; ZNF7, Zinc Finger Protein 7; SLC24A2, solute carrier family 24 member 2 and lncRNA RP11-372K14.2. The code for the preprocessing step can be found in the GitHub repository https://github.com/AC-PHD/NoLabelPFA, along with the characteristic feature extraction https://github.com/LauritzR/characteristic-feature-extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.