Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630673›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Dengue vector control in high-income, city settings: A scoping review of approaches and methods.

Anna Durrance-Bagale, Nirel Hoe, Jane Lai, Jonathan Wee Kent Liew, Hannah Clapham, Natasha Howard

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interventions for preventing dengue: a mapping review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recommendations for dengue vaccine implementation in the elderly population.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Durrance-BagaleSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6674-1862
Nirel HoeSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Jane LaiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Jonathan Wee Kent LiewEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency, Singapore, Singapore.
Hannah ClaphamSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Natasha HowardSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGNational Environment Agency · SG

Funding

Singapore Ministry of Education
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue virus (DENV) is endemic to many parts of the world and has serious health and socioeconomic effects even in high-income countries, especially with rapid changes in the climate globally. We explored the literature on dengue vector control methods used in high-income, city settings and associations with dengue incidence, dengue prevalence, or mosquito vector densities.

methodsStudies of any design or year were included if they reported effects on human DENV infection or Aedes vector indices of dengue-specific vector control interventions in high-income, city settings.

resultsOf 24 eligible sources, most reported research in the United States (n = 8) or Australia (n = 5). Biocontrol (n = 12) and chemical control (n = 13) were the most frequently discussed vector control methods. Only 6 sources reported data on the effectiveness of a given method in reducing human DENV incidence or prevalence, 2 described effects of larval and adult control on Aedes DENV positivity, 20 reported effectiveness in reducing vector density, using insecticide, larvicide, source reduction, auto-dissemination of pyriproxyfen and Wolbachia, and only 1 described effects on human-vector contact.

conclusionsAs most studies reported reductions in vector densities, rather than any effects on human DENV incidence or prevalence, we can draw no clear conclusions on which interventions might be most effective in reducing dengue in high-income, city areas. More research is needed linking evidence on the effects of different DENV vector control methods with dengue incidence/prevalence or mosquito vector densities in high-income, city settings as this is likely to differ from low-income settings. This is a significant evidence gap as climate changes increase the global reach of DENV. The importance of community involvement was clear in several studies, although it is impossible to tease out the relative contributions of this from other control methods used.

Indexed as

AedesDengueDengue VirusAdultAnimalsCitiesHumansMosquito ControlMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID38630673
PMCPMC11023197
OpenAlexW4394874913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.