Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630667›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

The impact of maternal mood and economic stress during Covid-19 pandemic on infant behaviour: Findings from the cross-sectional UK Covid-19 New Mum Study.

Adriana Vázquez-Vázquez, Emeline Rougeaux, Sarah Dib, Mary Fewtrell, Jonathan C Wells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adriana Vázquez-VázquezChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-741X
Emeline RougeauxChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah DibChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Mary FewtrellChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9783-3444
Jonathan C WellsChildhood Nutrition Research Centre, Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-8025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UK Covid-19 New Mum Study (cross-sectional study) recorded maternal experience during the early stages of the pandemic. Our previous analyses showed that the pandemic and 2020 national lockdown negatively impacted maternal mental health. Here, we describe changes in infant behaviour (crying and fussiness) reported by the mother during the Covid-19 pandemic compared to beforehand, and test whether these changes are associated with maternal variables (mental health, coping, financial insecurity, income and household support). We included only responses of mothers whose infants were born before the pandemic started (n = 2,031). Composite scores for maternal mental health and coping were obtained using principal components analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to test whether maternal mood and coping and household financial stresses were associated with changes in infant behaviour considered negative (becoming fussier, crying more). Adjusting for confounders, the odds of the infant being fussier and crying more increased by 52% (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.35;1.72) and 64% (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.38;1.95), respectively, if the mother experienced poorer mental health. If the mother coped better and had more time to focus on her health and interests, the odds of these outcomes decreased by 27% (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.65;0.83) and 23% (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.65;0.91), respectively. Mothers who reported that, during the lockdown, household chores were more equally divided 'to a high extent' had 40% (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.39;0.92) lower odds of reporting that their babies became fussier. Reporting major/moderate impact on food expenses was associated with the infant crying more (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.16;5.50). Our results are consistent with previous studies showing that maternal wellbeing plays a significant role in children's behavioural changes during lockdowns. We need strategies to improve mental health and enable women to develop the skills to maintain resilience and reassure their children in challenging times.

Identifiers

PMID38630667
PMCPMC11023226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.