Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630660›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effects of relational and instrumental messaging on human perception of rattlesnakes.

Erin B Allison, Emily N Taylor, Zackary A Graham, Melissa Amarello, Jeffrey J Smith, Zachary J Loughman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erin B AllisonDept of Organismal Biology, Ecology, and Zoo Science, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV, United States of America.
Emily N TaylorBiological Sciences Dept, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States of America.
Zackary A GrahamDept of Organismal Biology, Ecology, and Zoo Science, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6132-2885
Melissa AmarelloAdvocates for Snake Preservation, Silver City, NM, United States of America.
Jeffrey J SmithAdvocates for Snake Preservation, Silver City, NM, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0009-1940-7736
Zachary J LoughmanDept of Organismal Biology, Ecology, and Zoo Science, West Liberty University, West Liberty, WV, United States of America.
West Liberty University · USAdvocates for Youth · USCalifornia Polytechnic State University · USThe Nature Conservancy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the effects of relational and instrumental message strategies on US residents' perception of rattlesnakes-animals that tend to generate feelings of fear, disgust, or hatred but are nevertheless key members of healthy ecosystems. We deployed an online survey to social media users (n = 1,182) to describe perceptions of rattlesnakes and assess the change after viewing a randomly selected relational or instrumental video message. An 8-item, pre-and post-Rattlesnake Perception Test (RPT) evaluated perception variables along emotional, knowledge, and behavioral gradients on a 5-point Likert scale; the eight responses were combined to produce an Aggregate Rattlesnake Perception (ARP) score for each participant. We found that people from Abrahamic religions (i.e., Christianity, Judaism, Islam) and those identifying as female were associated with low initial perceptions of rattlesnakes, whereas agnostics and individuals residing in the Midwest region and in rural residential areas had relatively favorable perceptions. Overall, both videos produced positive changes in rattlesnake perception, although the instrumental video message led to a greater increase in ARP than the relational message. The relational message was associated with significant increases in ARP only among females, agnostics, Baby Boomers (age 57-75), and Generation-Z (age 18-25 to exclude minors). The instrumental video message was associated with significant increases in ARP, and this result varied by religious group. ARP changed less in those reporting prior experience with a venomous snake bite (to them, a friend, or a pet) than in those with no such experience. Our data suggest that relational and instrumental message strategies can improve people's perceptions of unpopular and potentially dangerous wildlife, but their effectiveness may vary by gender, age, religious beliefs, and experience. These results can be used to hone and personalize communication strategies to improve perceptions of unpopular wildlife species.

Indexed as

CrotalusEcosystemAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAnimals, WildCommunicationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38630660
PMCPMC11023442
OpenAlexW4394892503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.